The Stanford Daily
News
Wednesday March 5, 2008
Home
Other Issues
This Issue
Front page
News
Sports
Opinions
Clinton stops Obama’s streak
McCain sweeps primaries to earn GOP nomination
March 5, 2008
By Nick Parker
As Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) regained some of the momentum she had lost to Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) in the protracted fight for the Democratic presidential nomination Tuesday night, Stanford supporters from both camps offered positive outlooks on the evening’s results and were optimistic about what the future holds.
Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain clinched his party’s nomination with sweeping victories in all four states that voted last night — Ohio, Rhode Island, Texas and Vermont — prompting his main challenger, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, to concede the GOP nomination. But the Democratic picture is far murkier after last night’s results.---
Ted Rudow III,MA
Sen. John McCain got the support of Texas pastor John Hagee, an evangelical Christian who has made support for the state of Israel a centerpiece of his ministry.Hagee endorsed McCain ,saying he did so because McCain is a pro-life, pro-Israel politician who has pledged to secure the country's borders
There's a rabidly Zionist bunch of Christians in the U.S. which is also adamantly opposed to Iran getting the bomb, in case it might attack Israel. John Hagee is very liberal with his ministry’s money when it comes to Israel. A Religious News Service report stated that Hagee raised over $1 million to help Soviet Jews resettle in Israel. He believes that Jews already have a covenant with God and a relationship to God and do not need to come to the cross. This certainly is a shocking statement in the light of Jesus’ words that “no man comes to the Father but through me” (John 14:6).
Wednesday, March 05, 2008
Tuesday, March 04, 2008
Summer Olympics '08: A time for glory and protest?
Summer Olympics '08: A time for glory and protest?
Spartan Daily - Serving San Jose State University since 1934
News
Opinion
Sports
Home > Opinion
Summer Olympics '08: A time for glory and protest?
Samuel Lam
Abstract:
With protesters labeling the Games as the "Genocide Olympics," we could be witnessing a huge display of politics in action in Beijing come summertime. This is not the first time politics and this international sporting event have clashed....
Ted Rudow III,MA
The Olympics are the worship of man, the worship of his body. Fairs are the worship of his mind, his mental achievements and creations and the works of his hands. But sports are the worship of man's body; education is the worship of his mind; business is the worship of the works of his hands; and churches and Churchianity are the worship of his spirit, his own spirit, not God or God's Spirit; and war is the ultimate that all of these lead to! The ultimate manifestation of all of these is War!--His physical prowess, his mechanical ingenuity, his tactical genius and his indomitable spirit!
War is the ultimate combination of the worship of all these things, at what man considers his greatest, using the best of all of these!--Man at his best, which is his worst!--WAR! His most destructive worst, his greatest strength, his greatest genius, his greatest inventive power and his greatest spirit, patriotism or whatever you want to call it, is used for war and a competitive spirit against others who are doing the same!
The Olympics is a sports fair, a flesh fair, flesh peddlers! See how this competitive sports thing has been the final stages of every great civilisation and empire!--The worship of the body!
Ted Rudow III,MA
Class of 1996
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////
State Supreme Court takes up same-sex marriage
SFGate
Home of the San Francisco Chronicle
Home Delivery | Today's Paper | Ads SFGate Web Search by YAHOO! | Advanced Search
Home
News
Sports
Today
Breaking News
Today's Chronicle
Traffic
Weather Sections
Bay Area & State
Business
Crime
Education
Environment
Health & Medicine
Nation
Obituaries
Opinion
Politics
Comments
State Supreme Court takes up same-sex marriage
Bob Egelko, Chronicle Staff Writer
"As gay-rights groups call for marital equality and opponents warn of a public backlash, societal decay and religious conflict, the California Supreme Court is prepared for an epic three-hour hearing Tuesday on the constitutionality of the state law defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman."
The issue of homosexuality from a Biblical standpoint, delving into gay lifestyles, practices and inroads into modern society, in an attempt to discover why God equated the practice of homosexuality with the ancient wicked cities of Sodom and Gomorrah.--Why homosexuality (Sodomy) and those who flaunt it are abhorrent in His sight. Why Is Sodomy So Offensive to God? The starting point for understanding both human sexuality in general and homosexuality in particular should be the account of the creation of man and woman in Genesis 1 and 2. Chapter 1 deliberately notes that the man made in God's image was created male and female, connecting this with the command to reproduce ( Gen. 1:27,28 ). The creation of male and female, of husband and wife who bear children together, was meant to be a beautiful physical illustration of the Lord's relationship with His Bride, the Church, out of which would come new souls for His Kingdom. A homosexual relationship, on the other hand, negates it!
Ted Rudow III,MA
Spartan Daily - Serving San Jose State University since 1934
News
Opinion
Sports
Home > Opinion
Summer Olympics '08: A time for glory and protest?
Samuel Lam
Abstract:
With protesters labeling the Games as the "Genocide Olympics," we could be witnessing a huge display of politics in action in Beijing come summertime. This is not the first time politics and this international sporting event have clashed....
Ted Rudow III,MA
The Olympics are the worship of man, the worship of his body. Fairs are the worship of his mind, his mental achievements and creations and the works of his hands. But sports are the worship of man's body; education is the worship of his mind; business is the worship of the works of his hands; and churches and Churchianity are the worship of his spirit, his own spirit, not God or God's Spirit; and war is the ultimate that all of these lead to! The ultimate manifestation of all of these is War!--His physical prowess, his mechanical ingenuity, his tactical genius and his indomitable spirit!
War is the ultimate combination of the worship of all these things, at what man considers his greatest, using the best of all of these!--Man at his best, which is his worst!--WAR! His most destructive worst, his greatest strength, his greatest genius, his greatest inventive power and his greatest spirit, patriotism or whatever you want to call it, is used for war and a competitive spirit against others who are doing the same!
The Olympics is a sports fair, a flesh fair, flesh peddlers! See how this competitive sports thing has been the final stages of every great civilisation and empire!--The worship of the body!
Ted Rudow III,MA
Class of 1996
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////
State Supreme Court takes up same-sex marriage
SFGate
Home of the San Francisco Chronicle
Home Delivery | Today's Paper | Ads SFGate Web Search by YAHOO! | Advanced Search
Home
News
Sports
Today
Breaking News
Today's Chronicle
Traffic
Weather Sections
Bay Area & State
Business
Crime
Education
Environment
Health & Medicine
Nation
Obituaries
Opinion
Politics
Comments
State Supreme Court takes up same-sex marriage
Bob Egelko, Chronicle Staff Writer
"As gay-rights groups call for marital equality and opponents warn of a public backlash, societal decay and religious conflict, the California Supreme Court is prepared for an epic three-hour hearing Tuesday on the constitutionality of the state law defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman."
The issue of homosexuality from a Biblical standpoint, delving into gay lifestyles, practices and inroads into modern society, in an attempt to discover why God equated the practice of homosexuality with the ancient wicked cities of Sodom and Gomorrah.--Why homosexuality (Sodomy) and those who flaunt it are abhorrent in His sight. Why Is Sodomy So Offensive to God? The starting point for understanding both human sexuality in general and homosexuality in particular should be the account of the creation of man and woman in Genesis 1 and 2. Chapter 1 deliberately notes that the man made in God's image was created male and female, connecting this with the command to reproduce ( Gen. 1:27,28 ). The creation of male and female, of husband and wife who bear children together, was meant to be a beautiful physical illustration of the Lord's relationship with His Bride, the Church, out of which would come new souls for His Kingdom. A homosexual relationship, on the other hand, negates it!
Ted Rudow III,MA
Monday, March 03, 2008
The threat is to Israel
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/03/03/18483279.php
The threat is to Israel
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77 [at] aol.com )
Monday Mar 3rd, 2008 2:21 PM
In 2003, the Iranians sent a very comprehensive offer of negotiations to Washington. In that offer, they actually listed the points that they would be willing to negotiate, and they included the nuclear program in Iran; Iran’s support for Hezbollah, Hamas and Islamic jihad, and even the Beirut Declaration, in which Arab states proposed that they all recognize Israel in exchange for the recognition of—
the establishment of a Palestinian state. So all the agenda items that we claim to be interested in were in this offer, which was delivered by the Swiss ambassador in Tehran to Washington. Not only did we not reply to that offer, but we actually reprimanded the Swiss ambassador for having the temerity to bring it to us.
Now, that was the policy of the old government in Tehran, the government headed by President Khatami. The policy was, let’s extend a hand of friendship to the United States, let’s offer to negotiate. The other hard-liners then said, you tried that, and it didn’t work. We’ve got to try another policy, which is, you’ve got to make life as miserable as you can for the United States, because the policy of trying have a dialogue with them didn’t produce any results.
Is US policy today shoring up Ahmadinejad? I think so, and I even think that, not just shoring him up, we helped bring him to power. So I think that actually helped create the climate in which a conservative, militantly anti-American figure like Ahmadinejad was able to rise. It’s because when we had a more moderate president who was talking about the dialogue of civilizations, we just pushed him aside and didn’t talk to him.
STEPHEN KINZER
Iran’s not a threat to the U.S., just as Iraq wasn’t a threat to the U.S. The threat is to Israel, which has always worried about any of its neighbors getting ahold of nuclear weapons. Israel, of course, has many nuclear weapons. So Israel is egging on the U.S. to do something about it, and is hinting that if the U.S. doesn’t stop the Iranian nuclear program, then Israel will—the same way it stopped Iraq’s nuclear program years ago, by blowing up their reactor. The U.S. professes that it supports democracy in the Middle East yet when there was a democratic government in Iran the U.S. destroyed it.
Ted Rudow III,MA
The threat is to Israel
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77 [at] aol.com )
Monday Mar 3rd, 2008 2:21 PM
In 2003, the Iranians sent a very comprehensive offer of negotiations to Washington. In that offer, they actually listed the points that they would be willing to negotiate, and they included the nuclear program in Iran; Iran’s support for Hezbollah, Hamas and Islamic jihad, and even the Beirut Declaration, in which Arab states proposed that they all recognize Israel in exchange for the recognition of—
the establishment of a Palestinian state. So all the agenda items that we claim to be interested in were in this offer, which was delivered by the Swiss ambassador in Tehran to Washington. Not only did we not reply to that offer, but we actually reprimanded the Swiss ambassador for having the temerity to bring it to us.
Now, that was the policy of the old government in Tehran, the government headed by President Khatami. The policy was, let’s extend a hand of friendship to the United States, let’s offer to negotiate. The other hard-liners then said, you tried that, and it didn’t work. We’ve got to try another policy, which is, you’ve got to make life as miserable as you can for the United States, because the policy of trying have a dialogue with them didn’t produce any results.
Is US policy today shoring up Ahmadinejad? I think so, and I even think that, not just shoring him up, we helped bring him to power. So I think that actually helped create the climate in which a conservative, militantly anti-American figure like Ahmadinejad was able to rise. It’s because when we had a more moderate president who was talking about the dialogue of civilizations, we just pushed him aside and didn’t talk to him.
STEPHEN KINZER
Iran’s not a threat to the U.S., just as Iraq wasn’t a threat to the U.S. The threat is to Israel, which has always worried about any of its neighbors getting ahold of nuclear weapons. Israel, of course, has many nuclear weapons. So Israel is egging on the U.S. to do something about it, and is hinting that if the U.S. doesn’t stop the Iranian nuclear program, then Israel will—the same way it stopped Iraq’s nuclear program years ago, by blowing up their reactor. The U.S. professes that it supports democracy in the Middle East yet when there was a democratic government in Iran the U.S. destroyed it.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Saturday, March 01, 2008
Little narrow
Sacbee: Opinion Newsletter Blogs | Cartoons | Daily Debate | Editorials | Forum | Letters
Rex Babin Cartoons
Stagflation
March 1,2008
Little narrow
As usual, the Republicans are out to protect the rich--and to hell with the poor! The only thing they think of with their little narrow minds is, how can I hang on to my money--my investments--my big dollars in the banks--to protect all my interests? The rich are notoriously shortsighted when it comes to protecting their riches. They think by hanging onto them, they can protect them. But God's method of protecting them is to give to the poor--give them out--keep it in circulation--literally socialization! You're going to have to be better to the poor, or you're going to go bankrupt. You cannot amass all this wealth in the hands of a few rich and get away with it. ( Luke 12:15-21. ) The rust of their money is going to be a testimony against them. ( James 5:1-3. ) Why is the rust a testimony against them? Something that isn't used gets rusty--because they didn't put it to use and keep it in circulation.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Rex Babin Cartoons
Stagflation
March 1,2008
Little narrow
As usual, the Republicans are out to protect the rich--and to hell with the poor! The only thing they think of with their little narrow minds is, how can I hang on to my money--my investments--my big dollars in the banks--to protect all my interests? The rich are notoriously shortsighted when it comes to protecting their riches. They think by hanging onto them, they can protect them. But God's method of protecting them is to give to the poor--give them out--keep it in circulation--literally socialization! You're going to have to be better to the poor, or you're going to go bankrupt. You cannot amass all this wealth in the hands of a few rich and get away with it. ( Luke 12:15-21. ) The rust of their money is going to be a testimony against them. ( James 5:1-3. ) Why is the rust a testimony against them? Something that isn't used gets rusty--because they didn't put it to use and keep it in circulation.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Friday, February 29, 2008
Prisoners of the compromises
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/02/29/18482557.php
Prisoners of the compromises
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77 [at] aol.com )
Friday Feb 29th, 2008 7:49 AM
Jeremy Scahill reports Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama will not “rule out” using private military companies like Blackwater Worldwide in Iraq.
Obama also has no plans to sign on to legislation that seeks to ban the use of these forces in US war zones by January 2009.
Despite their antiwar rhetoric, both Obama and Senator Hillary Clinton have adopted the congressional Democratic position that would leave open the option of keeping tens of thousands of US troops in Iraq for many years. Those who would reach such a lofty office in the eyes of the world have entangled themselves deeply in the affairs of this world. Those who are elected to this office that is so highly esteemed among men have few choices left to them.
When in their hearts they know exactly where they stand, and which way they’ll go when the showdown comes as many Democratic and Republican leaders have. They are prisoners of the compromises they have made to attain the office, prisoners of their advisers and counselors, prisoners of the policies of their party and the values of their nation. They are heavily influenced by Superdelegate as well and will bow down to their will!
Ted Rudow III,MA
Prisoners of the compromises
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77 [at] aol.com )
Friday Feb 29th, 2008 7:49 AM
Jeremy Scahill reports Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama will not “rule out” using private military companies like Blackwater Worldwide in Iraq.
Obama also has no plans to sign on to legislation that seeks to ban the use of these forces in US war zones by January 2009.
Despite their antiwar rhetoric, both Obama and Senator Hillary Clinton have adopted the congressional Democratic position that would leave open the option of keeping tens of thousands of US troops in Iraq for many years. Those who would reach such a lofty office in the eyes of the world have entangled themselves deeply in the affairs of this world. Those who are elected to this office that is so highly esteemed among men have few choices left to them.
When in their hearts they know exactly where they stand, and which way they’ll go when the showdown comes as many Democratic and Republican leaders have. They are prisoners of the compromises they have made to attain the office, prisoners of their advisers and counselors, prisoners of the policies of their party and the values of their nation. They are heavily influenced by Superdelegate as well and will bow down to their will!
Ted Rudow III,MA
Wednesday, February 27, 2008
The blindness of one
The blindness of one
The Stanford Daily
News
Wednesday February 27, 2008
Home
Other Issues
«Previous
Archives
This Issue
Front page
News
Sports
Opinions
Profs. examine economic decline
Experts assess future, Bush’s fiscal policy
February 27, 2008
By Kamil Dada
President George W. Bush publicly stated yesterday that the U.S. economy was not in a recession and that he believed it would not fall into a downturn. Given that economic reports show that U.S. consumer confidence has slumped to its worst in five years, and home prices fell 8.9 percent last year, his view is not one that everyone shares — including a number of scholars at Stanford.
Emeritus Economics Prof. Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel-prize winning economist who formerly served as vice president and chief economist of the World Bank, said Tuesday that the U.S. economy is probably in a recession with the housing-market collapse dragging down consumer spending.----
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
The credit storm which began in July when two Bear Stearns hedge funds were forced to liquidate, has continued to intensify. Last week the noose tightened around auction-rate securities, a little-known part of the market that requires short-term funding to set rates for long-term municipal bonds. The $330 billion ARS market has dried up overnight pushing up rates as high as 20 per cent on some bonds -- a new benchmark for short term debt. Auction-rate securities are now headed for extinction just like the other previously-vital parts of the structured finance paradigm.
The $2 trillion market for collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), the multi-trillion dollar mortgage-backed securities market (MBSs) and the $1.3 asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) market have all shut down draining a small ocean of capital from the financial system and pushing many of the banks and hedge funds closer to default.
Number of famous economists, they are each planning to be somewhere else when the crash comes which they predict will topple the rich nations like tumbling tenpins into an economic chaos that will make the Great Depression of the Thirties look like good times. It is the arrogance of one, the unyieldedness of the other, the greed of one, the selfishness of the other, the blindness of one, the hardness of the other, and all of these things in some of those involved! In this case, the love of money is at the root of this evil, for it is what drives the forces at work.
Ted Rudow III,MA
The Stanford Daily
News
Wednesday February 27, 2008
Home
Other Issues
«Previous
Archives
This Issue
Front page
News
Sports
Opinions
Profs. examine economic decline
Experts assess future, Bush’s fiscal policy
February 27, 2008
By Kamil Dada
President George W. Bush publicly stated yesterday that the U.S. economy was not in a recession and that he believed it would not fall into a downturn. Given that economic reports show that U.S. consumer confidence has slumped to its worst in five years, and home prices fell 8.9 percent last year, his view is not one that everyone shares — including a number of scholars at Stanford.
Emeritus Economics Prof. Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel-prize winning economist who formerly served as vice president and chief economist of the World Bank, said Tuesday that the U.S. economy is probably in a recession with the housing-market collapse dragging down consumer spending.----
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
The credit storm which began in July when two Bear Stearns hedge funds were forced to liquidate, has continued to intensify. Last week the noose tightened around auction-rate securities, a little-known part of the market that requires short-term funding to set rates for long-term municipal bonds. The $330 billion ARS market has dried up overnight pushing up rates as high as 20 per cent on some bonds -- a new benchmark for short term debt. Auction-rate securities are now headed for extinction just like the other previously-vital parts of the structured finance paradigm.
The $2 trillion market for collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), the multi-trillion dollar mortgage-backed securities market (MBSs) and the $1.3 asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) market have all shut down draining a small ocean of capital from the financial system and pushing many of the banks and hedge funds closer to default.
Number of famous economists, they are each planning to be somewhere else when the crash comes which they predict will topple the rich nations like tumbling tenpins into an economic chaos that will make the Great Depression of the Thirties look like good times. It is the arrogance of one, the unyieldedness of the other, the greed of one, the selfishness of the other, the blindness of one, the hardness of the other, and all of these things in some of those involved! In this case, the love of money is at the root of this evil, for it is what drives the forces at work.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
Ravages of war
Tuesday
February
26
2008
San Mateo Daily Journal
Home
Local News
State / National / World
Sports
Opinion / Letters
Business
Arts / Entertainment
Letters to the editor
Ravages of war
Editor,
Three young men, all former soldiers in the Israeli Defense Force, founded “Breaking the Silence” to do just that. It is a forum for former combat veterans — most of them in their 20s and early 30s — to talk about the way a brutal occupation made them brutes. Soldiers Avichai Sharon, Yehuda Shaul and Noam Chayut organized an exhibition of photographs and soldiers’ testimonies from their military service in the West Bank city of Hebron. They acted for the sake of their own mental health and, they say, to force Israel to confront the truth about its policies.
“What haunts me? It’s the memories of 6-year-old, 7-year-old Palestinian children watching with tears in their eyes (video) when you’re tossing their rooms, breaking their walls, taking their father and slamming him into the wall before arresting--Responsibility is to every human being in the world, and for sure for Americans, because in the end of the day for all what Israel does, there is only one country in the world that, you know, the chief of staff and the prime minister of Israel has to report in the end of the day, and that’s the United States of America.”
One of the main supporters of the backward policies is AIPAC, or the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, that describes itself as the most important organization affecting the U.S. relationship with Israel. With a budget of $65 million, and membership now standing at over 100,000, it is no wonder that congressional staffers consider it one of the most powerful and effective lobbies on Capitol Hill. Including AIPAC’s support for U.S. military aid to Israel, which amounts to over $3 billion per year.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Spartan Daily - Serving San Jose State University since 1934
News
Opinion
Sports
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
Letter | Academics are more important than sports for the university?
Abstract:
...
Sports should be secondary. Why give athletics an increase in funding? Academics are important and the university should facilitate the students with faculty and classes/courses. Let's facilitate the students' educational career instead of the seemingly habitual and persistent impediment of invaluable educational growth.
Jesus Angulo
Mexican-American StudiesGraduate Student
Post Comment
Go to Article
Comments in Other Articles
RSS Feed
The only escape for me, I thought, was sports. So I practiced and practiced basketball until I received many offers included West Point! I recieved an athletic scholarship to attend the University of California at Berkeley, in 1970.
The Vietman War was going on, and Berkeley was the hot-bed of radical resistance. I was on the honor roll and was voted first-team all-Northern California freshman in basketball, Captain and Most Valuable Player in 1971.
I felt pressures on many sides to really put out all my time and energy towards becoming a basketball star in college and pressing toward a professional career. On the other hand, deep within my heart, I felt that there was something wrong with all this!I felt caught between two worlds,one with the teachings of Jesus and His commandment to love thy neighbor,while in the other world, I was told to gain a near-manical desire to win and to physically punish my opponent in a defeat!
Time after time,scientists and social scientists had determine that sports actually aggravate conflict and aggression,as well damage bodies! My former U.C. Berkeley basketball coach,(1970-2), was verbally abusive and he got fired for hitting a player at another college! Did you know that the Nicargua-El Salvador war,in which 20,000 people were killed,started over a football game? In fact,Ernest Hemingway,who spent so much time in Latin America and Spain,said you could eliminate most Latin American wars and their causes by simply banning football or soccer!
Competitive Sports is war in disguised.
Ted Rudow III,
February
26
2008
San Mateo Daily Journal
Home
Local News
State / National / World
Sports
Opinion / Letters
Business
Arts / Entertainment
Letters to the editor
Ravages of war
Editor,
Three young men, all former soldiers in the Israeli Defense Force, founded “Breaking the Silence” to do just that. It is a forum for former combat veterans — most of them in their 20s and early 30s — to talk about the way a brutal occupation made them brutes. Soldiers Avichai Sharon, Yehuda Shaul and Noam Chayut organized an exhibition of photographs and soldiers’ testimonies from their military service in the West Bank city of Hebron. They acted for the sake of their own mental health and, they say, to force Israel to confront the truth about its policies.
“What haunts me? It’s the memories of 6-year-old, 7-year-old Palestinian children watching with tears in their eyes (video) when you’re tossing their rooms, breaking their walls, taking their father and slamming him into the wall before arresting--Responsibility is to every human being in the world, and for sure for Americans, because in the end of the day for all what Israel does, there is only one country in the world that, you know, the chief of staff and the prime minister of Israel has to report in the end of the day, and that’s the United States of America.”
One of the main supporters of the backward policies is AIPAC, or the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, that describes itself as the most important organization affecting the U.S. relationship with Israel. With a budget of $65 million, and membership now standing at over 100,000, it is no wonder that congressional staffers consider it one of the most powerful and effective lobbies on Capitol Hill. Including AIPAC’s support for U.S. military aid to Israel, which amounts to over $3 billion per year.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Spartan Daily - Serving San Jose State University since 1934
News
Opinion
Sports
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
Letter | Academics are more important than sports for the university?
Abstract:
...
Sports should be secondary. Why give athletics an increase in funding? Academics are important and the university should facilitate the students with faculty and classes/courses. Let's facilitate the students' educational career instead of the seemingly habitual and persistent impediment of invaluable educational growth.
Jesus Angulo
Mexican-American StudiesGraduate Student
Post Comment
Go to Article
Comments in Other Articles
RSS Feed
The only escape for me, I thought, was sports. So I practiced and practiced basketball until I received many offers included West Point! I recieved an athletic scholarship to attend the University of California at Berkeley, in 1970.
The Vietman War was going on, and Berkeley was the hot-bed of radical resistance. I was on the honor roll and was voted first-team all-Northern California freshman in basketball, Captain and Most Valuable Player in 1971.
I felt pressures on many sides to really put out all my time and energy towards becoming a basketball star in college and pressing toward a professional career. On the other hand, deep within my heart, I felt that there was something wrong with all this!I felt caught between two worlds,one with the teachings of Jesus and His commandment to love thy neighbor,while in the other world, I was told to gain a near-manical desire to win and to physically punish my opponent in a defeat!
Time after time,scientists and social scientists had determine that sports actually aggravate conflict and aggression,as well damage bodies! My former U.C. Berkeley basketball coach,(1970-2), was verbally abusive and he got fired for hitting a player at another college! Did you know that the Nicargua-El Salvador war,in which 20,000 people were killed,started over a football game? In fact,Ernest Hemingway,who spent so much time in Latin America and Spain,said you could eliminate most Latin American wars and their causes by simply banning football or soccer!
Competitive Sports is war in disguised.
Ted Rudow III,
Friday, February 22, 2008
A HIDDEN HAND?--SATAN?
The Stanford Daily
Opinions
Friday February 22, 2008
Home
Other Issues
«Previous
Archives
This Issue
Front page
News
Sports
Opinions
'Nat'-ural Philosophy: Hail SATANford Hail
February 22, 2008
By Nat Hillard
Satanists of Stanford University, unite! From today forward, we shall no longer lie in the shadows. Standing against the backdrop of White Plaza, an enormous banner reads “may the love of SATAN be with you.” The name “Jesus” has been crossed out, and SATAN has, very cleverly, been placed above it on a new piece of paper.----
A HIDDEN HAND?--SATAN?
The kingdom of darkness is real and is the spiritual source of all opposition to God.
The lord of this diabolical kingdom is the "prince of the air," more commonly known as Satan, or the Devil. With a horde of wicked spirits at his command, he is called the "god of this [fallen] world" ( 2 Corinthians 4:4 ). As this world's ruler, his task is to oppose all of God's efforts to redeem Man. The battlefield here is primarily the human mind. Using a variety of techniques, Satan's strategy is to fill us with lies, to convince us that black is white and evil is good, to justify sin and blind us to our need for a Saviour, to distort our image of God and erase or trivialise our image of Satan, convincing us that he either doesn't exist or that he's a cartoon imp in red pajamas. Put simply, "to blind the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, Who is the image of God, should shine unto them" ( 2 Corinthians 4:4 ).
Given its power over the heart of Man, music is among the most potent of these techniques. And it's worth noting that both the Scriptures and church tradition suggest that music comes quite naturally to Satan, that very possibly, before his fall, he was in charge of music in Heaven. (See Isaiah 14:11 ; Ezekiel 28:13-15 .)
Of course, any style of music can be perverted by evil. Many of the elements this presentation examines are found in other musical forms as well. The reason for our focus on rock is both its unparalleled popularity and the manner in which it has given place to evil. Subtly at first, and then with increasing blatancy as rock's celebrants have been brought under its rhythmic sway, it has become one of the most potent weapons in Satan's arsenal of deception.
Fortunately, Satan's proven tendency for over-achieving has resulted in a blatancy that, when examined by an objective inquirer, can be used to expose the Devil's presence and purposes--hence this presentation.
And one last point before we begin to dust rock music for Satan's fingerprints--2 Corinthians tells us that Satan can transform himself into an angel of light ( 2 Corinthians 11:14 )--that he can, in other words, appear as something beautiful, even Christ-like. Don't be fooled! Satan doesn't just manifest his power through a Hitler or a Charles Manson. He can use your favourite guitarist, a pretty pop singer, maybe even you! Anyone who resists the will of God is fertile soil for his seeds of deception.
Satan had a great deal of control over Mankind until Jesus. On the cross, Jesus' thorn-torn brow and pierced body provided the perfect blood sacrifice for our sins. Now Satan's once mighty power is broken over anyone who believes on that blood, in Jesus and His sacrifice for us. It's no wonder Satan hates it. Can we find this demonic hatred in rock music? Sadly, yes.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Opinions
Friday February 22, 2008
Home
Other Issues
«Previous
Archives
This Issue
Front page
News
Sports
Opinions
'Nat'-ural Philosophy: Hail SATANford Hail
February 22, 2008
By Nat Hillard
Satanists of Stanford University, unite! From today forward, we shall no longer lie in the shadows. Standing against the backdrop of White Plaza, an enormous banner reads “may the love of SATAN be with you.” The name “Jesus” has been crossed out, and SATAN has, very cleverly, been placed above it on a new piece of paper.----
A HIDDEN HAND?--SATAN?
The kingdom of darkness is real and is the spiritual source of all opposition to God.
The lord of this diabolical kingdom is the "prince of the air," more commonly known as Satan, or the Devil. With a horde of wicked spirits at his command, he is called the "god of this [fallen] world" ( 2 Corinthians 4:4 ). As this world's ruler, his task is to oppose all of God's efforts to redeem Man. The battlefield here is primarily the human mind. Using a variety of techniques, Satan's strategy is to fill us with lies, to convince us that black is white and evil is good, to justify sin and blind us to our need for a Saviour, to distort our image of God and erase or trivialise our image of Satan, convincing us that he either doesn't exist or that he's a cartoon imp in red pajamas. Put simply, "to blind the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, Who is the image of God, should shine unto them" ( 2 Corinthians 4:4 ).
Given its power over the heart of Man, music is among the most potent of these techniques. And it's worth noting that both the Scriptures and church tradition suggest that music comes quite naturally to Satan, that very possibly, before his fall, he was in charge of music in Heaven. (See Isaiah 14:11 ; Ezekiel 28:13-15 .)
Of course, any style of music can be perverted by evil. Many of the elements this presentation examines are found in other musical forms as well. The reason for our focus on rock is both its unparalleled popularity and the manner in which it has given place to evil. Subtly at first, and then with increasing blatancy as rock's celebrants have been brought under its rhythmic sway, it has become one of the most potent weapons in Satan's arsenal of deception.
Fortunately, Satan's proven tendency for over-achieving has resulted in a blatancy that, when examined by an objective inquirer, can be used to expose the Devil's presence and purposes--hence this presentation.
And one last point before we begin to dust rock music for Satan's fingerprints--2 Corinthians tells us that Satan can transform himself into an angel of light ( 2 Corinthians 11:14 )--that he can, in other words, appear as something beautiful, even Christ-like. Don't be fooled! Satan doesn't just manifest his power through a Hitler or a Charles Manson. He can use your favourite guitarist, a pretty pop singer, maybe even you! Anyone who resists the will of God is fertile soil for his seeds of deception.
Satan had a great deal of control over Mankind until Jesus. On the cross, Jesus' thorn-torn brow and pierced body provided the perfect blood sacrifice for our sins. Now Satan's once mighty power is broken over anyone who believes on that blood, in Jesus and His sacrifice for us. It's no wonder Satan hates it. Can we find this demonic hatred in rock music? Sadly, yes.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Thursday, February 21, 2008
Castro
Castro
Sacbee: Opinion Newsletter Blogs | Cartoons | Daily Debate | Editorials | Forum | Letters
Editorial: Time to change on Cuba
Wednesday, February 20, 2008
Restrictions and oppression.Castro has done both good and evil, both godly and ungodly things, and in his old age he seeks to make amends and to do better before he passes on. Cuba desires and needs a Latin government, one that will allows Cuba to flourish and grow, while keeping evil and iniquity under control and in check. He has done much good for them, because he cares for them and wishes to see them prosper and do well. Many of the people chafe under the unnecessary restrictions and oppression. They do not need American-style democracy imposed upon them, but they do need more freedom. America fought him over the decades, and he vowed he would not change or give up, and he became rigid. But the world around him changed and Cuba changed, and his rigidity and inflexibility that once kept and preserved his people now works against them. But he nears the end of his days and Cuba too will change. Castro has become an has been, for he has grown set in his ways over the years, sometimes out of necessity.
Ted Rudow III,MA
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/02/20/18480652.php
It's starting
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77 [at] aol.com )
Wednesday Feb 20th, 2008 5:10 PM
It's starting to become like Eastern Europe used to be in the days of the Soviet Union, when there were police informants all over the place, people who were recruited to inform the authorities about anything suspicious so it could be checked out.
Except nowadays governments are recruiting their entire populations to keep an eye out for anyone suspicious!
It hasn't gotten as bad as the Soviet Union was, of course, but it has had an effect on people and on society as a whole. There's more fear, less tolerance for differences, and certainly less tolerance for people who might appear to be "difference"
If it suits their purposes, governments don't have to wait for terrorists to come along to create "incidents," you know. Hitler certainly didn't, when he wanted to seize more power in Germany. He and his officers arranged for some people to set fire to the German parliament building, and then he blamed it on the communists. Not long afterwards, new laws were passed "for the Protection of the People and the State," new crackdowns were enacted, and Hitler's dictatorship was well on the way. So it wouldn't be the first time that a government used terrorism as a pretext!
Ted Rudow III,MA
The Stanford Daily
Opinions
Wednesday February 20, 2008
Home
Other Issues
«Previous
Archives
This Issue
Front page
News
Sports
Opinions
You're Not Special: An ode to Hennessy
February 20, 2008
By Rahul Kanakia
... "What changes minds is real sacrifice. Getting clubbed by policemen who then throw you in jail while you’re still bleeding. Or fleeing to Canada, never knowing if you will return to the country of your birth. Non-violent protest is not passive. It involves people radically changing their lives for something they passionately believe. Generally all that happens is a couple gatherings in White Plaza between classes. And even when something a bit more spectacular, like a hunger strike, happens, it’s brief and easy to ignore. All this protesting is lame — and everyone knows it’s lame — and that’s why you never get anywhere."
It's starting to become like Eastern Europe used to be in the days of the Soviet Union, when there were police informants all over the place, people who were recruited to inform the authorities about anything suspicious so it could be checked out. Except nowadays governments are recruiting their entire populations to keep an eye out for anyone suspicious!
It hasn't gotten as bad as the Soviet Union was, of course, but it has had an effect on people and on society as a whole. There's more fear, less tolerance for differences, and certainly less tolerance for people who might appear to be "difference"
If it suits their purposes, governments don't have to wait for terrorists to come along to create "incidents," you know. Hitler certainly didn't, when he wanted to seize more power in Germany. He and his officers arranged for some people to set fire to the German parliament building, and then he blamed it on the communists. Not long afterwards, new laws were passed "for the Protection of the People and the State," new crackdowns were enacted, and Hitler's dictatorship was well on the way. So it wouldn't be the first time that a government used terrorism as a pretext!
Ted Rudow III,MA
Sacbee: Opinion Newsletter Blogs | Cartoons | Daily Debate | Editorials | Forum | Letters
Editorial: Time to change on Cuba
Wednesday, February 20, 2008
Restrictions and oppression.Castro has done both good and evil, both godly and ungodly things, and in his old age he seeks to make amends and to do better before he passes on. Cuba desires and needs a Latin government, one that will allows Cuba to flourish and grow, while keeping evil and iniquity under control and in check. He has done much good for them, because he cares for them and wishes to see them prosper and do well. Many of the people chafe under the unnecessary restrictions and oppression. They do not need American-style democracy imposed upon them, but they do need more freedom. America fought him over the decades, and he vowed he would not change or give up, and he became rigid. But the world around him changed and Cuba changed, and his rigidity and inflexibility that once kept and preserved his people now works against them. But he nears the end of his days and Cuba too will change. Castro has become an has been, for he has grown set in his ways over the years, sometimes out of necessity.
Ted Rudow III,MA
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/02/20/18480652.php
It's starting
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77 [at] aol.com )
Wednesday Feb 20th, 2008 5:10 PM
It's starting to become like Eastern Europe used to be in the days of the Soviet Union, when there were police informants all over the place, people who were recruited to inform the authorities about anything suspicious so it could be checked out.
Except nowadays governments are recruiting their entire populations to keep an eye out for anyone suspicious!
It hasn't gotten as bad as the Soviet Union was, of course, but it has had an effect on people and on society as a whole. There's more fear, less tolerance for differences, and certainly less tolerance for people who might appear to be "difference"
If it suits their purposes, governments don't have to wait for terrorists to come along to create "incidents," you know. Hitler certainly didn't, when he wanted to seize more power in Germany. He and his officers arranged for some people to set fire to the German parliament building, and then he blamed it on the communists. Not long afterwards, new laws were passed "for the Protection of the People and the State," new crackdowns were enacted, and Hitler's dictatorship was well on the way. So it wouldn't be the first time that a government used terrorism as a pretext!
Ted Rudow III,MA
The Stanford Daily
Opinions
Wednesday February 20, 2008
Home
Other Issues
«Previous
Archives
This Issue
Front page
News
Sports
Opinions
You're Not Special: An ode to Hennessy
February 20, 2008
By Rahul Kanakia
... "What changes minds is real sacrifice. Getting clubbed by policemen who then throw you in jail while you’re still bleeding. Or fleeing to Canada, never knowing if you will return to the country of your birth. Non-violent protest is not passive. It involves people radically changing their lives for something they passionately believe. Generally all that happens is a couple gatherings in White Plaza between classes. And even when something a bit more spectacular, like a hunger strike, happens, it’s brief and easy to ignore. All this protesting is lame — and everyone knows it’s lame — and that’s why you never get anywhere."
It's starting to become like Eastern Europe used to be in the days of the Soviet Union, when there were police informants all over the place, people who were recruited to inform the authorities about anything suspicious so it could be checked out. Except nowadays governments are recruiting their entire populations to keep an eye out for anyone suspicious!
It hasn't gotten as bad as the Soviet Union was, of course, but it has had an effect on people and on society as a whole. There's more fear, less tolerance for differences, and certainly less tolerance for people who might appear to be "difference"
If it suits their purposes, governments don't have to wait for terrorists to come along to create "incidents," you know. Hitler certainly didn't, when he wanted to seize more power in Germany. He and his officers arranged for some people to set fire to the German parliament building, and then he blamed it on the communists. Not long afterwards, new laws were passed "for the Protection of the People and the State," new crackdowns were enacted, and Hitler's dictatorship was well on the way. So it wouldn't be the first time that a government used terrorism as a pretext!
Ted Rudow III,MA
Wednesday, February 20, 2008
Fear of terrorism
Wednesday
February
20
2008
San Mateo Daily Journal
Home
Local News
State / National / World
Sports
Opinion / Letters
Business
Arts / Entertainment
Letters to the editor
Politicians play on people’s fear of terrorism
Editor,
Everyone was under observation in Orwell’s 1984, being watched at any time, and that’s how it’s becoming in many big cities around the world — and little ones as well. The fear of criminals or terrorists has infected society after society, and instead of teaching their citizens right from wrong or providing enough money and jobs for them so that they don’t have to turn to crime, they’re investing in surveillance equipment instead, so they can catch them when they do wrong.
It’s a culture of fear. Americans are afraid of terrorists or terrorism, and their government plays on those fears. In fact, it manipulates their fears, and even works to heighten them. That’s what helps to keep politicians in office: “Vote for me, because I can protect you. My opponent, on the other hand, is soft on terrorism.” And many people just don’t realize that they’re being bamboozled — that they’re giving up their money, their freedom, their privacy, their rights, to protect them from a threat that’s less likely to strike them than a bolt of lightning.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park
February
20
2008
San Mateo Daily Journal
Home
Local News
State / National / World
Sports
Opinion / Letters
Business
Arts / Entertainment
Letters to the editor
Politicians play on people’s fear of terrorism
Editor,
Everyone was under observation in Orwell’s 1984, being watched at any time, and that’s how it’s becoming in many big cities around the world — and little ones as well. The fear of criminals or terrorists has infected society after society, and instead of teaching their citizens right from wrong or providing enough money and jobs for them so that they don’t have to turn to crime, they’re investing in surveillance equipment instead, so they can catch them when they do wrong.
It’s a culture of fear. Americans are afraid of terrorists or terrorism, and their government plays on those fears. In fact, it manipulates their fears, and even works to heighten them. That’s what helps to keep politicians in office: “Vote for me, because I can protect you. My opponent, on the other hand, is soft on terrorism.” And many people just don’t realize that they’re being bamboozled — that they’re giving up their money, their freedom, their privacy, their rights, to protect them from a threat that’s less likely to strike them than a bolt of lightning.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park
Tuesday, February 19, 2008
What goes up,must come down!
What goes up,must come down!
Tuesday
February
19, 2008
San Mateo Daily Journal
Home
Local News
State / National / World
Sports
Opinion / Letters
Business
Arts / Entertainment
Community Forum
Archives
Advertise With Us
About Us
Letters to the editor
What goes up,must come down
Editor,
All great societies pass this way eventually, running up unsustainable debts and printing (or minting) currency in an increasingly desperate attempt to maintain the illusion of prosperity. And all, eventually, find themselves between the proverbial devil and deep blue sea: Either they simply collapse under the weight of their accumulated debt, as did the U.S. and Europe in the 1930s, or they keep running the printing presses until their currencies become worthless and their economies fall into chaos.
This is a big blow to the money men, the rich stock investors in New York and the U.S.A. and around the world. It starts with the U.S., then it sort of dominoes. How it will go this time, of course, nobody knows except the Lord, but we know there’s going to be a Crash, and a worldwide Crash, and this could be the beginning of the real crash.
How long can they stand that? And the U.S. itself has the biggest deficit it has ever had, amounting to nearly $5,132,265,067,831.71 current debt held by the public and Intragovernmental Holdings $4,105,743,221,110.40, total public debt outstanding of $9,238,008,288,942.11. Dollars that the United States owes and can’t pay. There has to come a day of reckoning, and it looks like it’s about to come.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Tuesday
February
19, 2008
San Mateo Daily Journal
Home
Local News
State / National / World
Sports
Opinion / Letters
Business
Arts / Entertainment
Community Forum
Archives
Advertise With Us
About Us
Letters to the editor
What goes up,must come down
Editor,
All great societies pass this way eventually, running up unsustainable debts and printing (or minting) currency in an increasingly desperate attempt to maintain the illusion of prosperity. And all, eventually, find themselves between the proverbial devil and deep blue sea: Either they simply collapse under the weight of their accumulated debt, as did the U.S. and Europe in the 1930s, or they keep running the printing presses until their currencies become worthless and their economies fall into chaos.
This is a big blow to the money men, the rich stock investors in New York and the U.S.A. and around the world. It starts with the U.S., then it sort of dominoes. How it will go this time, of course, nobody knows except the Lord, but we know there’s going to be a Crash, and a worldwide Crash, and this could be the beginning of the real crash.
How long can they stand that? And the U.S. itself has the biggest deficit it has ever had, amounting to nearly $5,132,265,067,831.71 current debt held by the public and Intragovernmental Holdings $4,105,743,221,110.40, total public debt outstanding of $9,238,008,288,942.11. Dollars that the United States owes and can’t pay. There has to come a day of reckoning, and it looks like it’s about to come.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Sunday, February 17, 2008
Clemens
Sacbee: Opinion Newsletter Blogs | Cartoons | Daily Debate | Editorials | Forum | Letters
Clemens
Sunday, February 17, 2008
They are hypocritical
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has acknowledged using steroids during his years as a champion body builder, said he doesn't regret using the performance-enhancing drugs. Schwarzenegger has acknowledged taking steroids, but pointed out that they were legal at the time. With such violent films as "The Terminator" (1984), he delivers the oft-quoted, straight-faced line "I'll be back" to a desk clerk and now he used that line in his speeches! Horrible!
Another case, that because of Clemens' friendship with President George W. Bush's father, former President George H.W. Bush, some predicted the pitcher will be pardoned should Clemens be indicted or convicted of anything related to the hearing.
They are hypocrite pretending to be everybody's friend and nobody's enemy, when in their hearts they know exactly where they stand, and which way they'll go when the showdown comes, as many Republican leaders have. It's the spirit of competition and pride, proving you're better than the other guy. So they take steriods! But the world just loves it!
Ted Rudow III,MA
Clemens
Sunday, February 17, 2008
They are hypocritical
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has acknowledged using steroids during his years as a champion body builder, said he doesn't regret using the performance-enhancing drugs. Schwarzenegger has acknowledged taking steroids, but pointed out that they were legal at the time. With such violent films as "The Terminator" (1984), he delivers the oft-quoted, straight-faced line "I'll be back" to a desk clerk and now he used that line in his speeches! Horrible!
Another case, that because of Clemens' friendship with President George W. Bush's father, former President George H.W. Bush, some predicted the pitcher will be pardoned should Clemens be indicted or convicted of anything related to the hearing.
They are hypocrite pretending to be everybody's friend and nobody's enemy, when in their hearts they know exactly where they stand, and which way they'll go when the showdown comes, as many Republican leaders have. It's the spirit of competition and pride, proving you're better than the other guy. So they take steriods! But the world just loves it!
Ted Rudow III,MA
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
Prisoners of the policies of their party
The Stanford Daily
Opinions
Wednesday February 13, 2008
Home
Other Issues
«Previous
Archives
This Issue
Front page
News
Sports
Opinions
The future of the vice presidency
February 13, 2008
By Editorial Board
"The United States has never had, and possibly will never have again, a vice president as powerful as Dick Cheney. Perhaps he will only be remembered by political scientists and White House history buffs, but remembered he will be. Now as Cheney serves his last year in office, it is time to analyze the mark he has left on the White House. ------
Ted Rudow III,MA
America is too far gone for that now, especially for the types of Christians who seek to become vice-president of that nation. The Lord advised His followers that 'No man that warreth entangleth himself with the affairs of this life; that he may please Him who hath chosen him to be a soldier' (2 Timothy 2:4). Those who would reach such a lofty office in the eyes of the world have entangled themselves deeply in the affairs of this world, and have separated themselves from Him.
Those who are elected to this office that is so highly esteemed among men have few choices left to them. They are prisoners of the compromises they have made to attain the office, prisoners of their advisers and counselors, prisoners of the policies of their party and the values of their nation. They are heavily influenced by Superdelegate as well and will bow down to their will!
Ted Rudow III,MA
Opinions
Wednesday February 13, 2008
Home
Other Issues
«Previous
Archives
This Issue
Front page
News
Sports
Opinions
The future of the vice presidency
February 13, 2008
By Editorial Board
"The United States has never had, and possibly will never have again, a vice president as powerful as Dick Cheney. Perhaps he will only be remembered by political scientists and White House history buffs, but remembered he will be. Now as Cheney serves his last year in office, it is time to analyze the mark he has left on the White House. ------
Ted Rudow III,MA
America is too far gone for that now, especially for the types of Christians who seek to become vice-president of that nation. The Lord advised His followers that 'No man that warreth entangleth himself with the affairs of this life; that he may please Him who hath chosen him to be a soldier' (2 Timothy 2:4). Those who would reach such a lofty office in the eyes of the world have entangled themselves deeply in the affairs of this world, and have separated themselves from Him.
Those who are elected to this office that is so highly esteemed among men have few choices left to them. They are prisoners of the compromises they have made to attain the office, prisoners of their advisers and counselors, prisoners of the policies of their party and the values of their nation. They are heavily influenced by Superdelegate as well and will bow down to their will!
Ted Rudow III,MA
Monday, February 11, 2008
Corporatocracy
San Francisco Examiner
California |Change My City
Now | Forecast 65/49
65/50
News By Location
Opinion
Local Politics
Ken Garcia
White House
N. Korea
Iraq
Letters
|
Ken Garcia
San Francisco Home > Opinion > Letters
Article Examiner
This is the most recent article version.
Corporations run the show
I voted for Sen. Barack Obama. But there is another side to the story.In the U.S., we know that the two final presidential candidates, Republican and Democrat alike, are going to each have to raise something like half a billion dollars. And that’s not going to come from us. Primarily that’s going to come from the people who own and run our big corporations. So the G8 is this group of countries that represent the biggest multinational corporations in the world and really serve at their behest.It doesn’t really matter whether we have a Democrat or a Republican in the White House or running Congress; the empire goes on, because it’s really run by what I call the corporatocracy, which is a group of men who run our biggest corporations. They really are the equivalent of the emperor, because they do not serve at the wish of the people, they’re not democratically elected, they don’t serve any limited term. They essentially answer to no one, except their own boards. They are the power behind this. Today, corporations exist for the primary purpose of making large profits, making a few very rich people a lot richer. That shouldn’t be.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park
California |Change My City
Now | Forecast 65/49
65/50
News By Location
Opinion
Local Politics
Ken Garcia
White House
N. Korea
Iraq
Letters
|
Ken Garcia
San Francisco Home > Opinion > Letters
Article Examiner
This is the most recent article version.
Corporations run the show
I voted for Sen. Barack Obama. But there is another side to the story.In the U.S., we know that the two final presidential candidates, Republican and Democrat alike, are going to each have to raise something like half a billion dollars. And that’s not going to come from us. Primarily that’s going to come from the people who own and run our big corporations. So the G8 is this group of countries that represent the biggest multinational corporations in the world and really serve at their behest.It doesn’t really matter whether we have a Democrat or a Republican in the White House or running Congress; the empire goes on, because it’s really run by what I call the corporatocracy, which is a group of men who run our biggest corporations. They really are the equivalent of the emperor, because they do not serve at the wish of the people, they’re not democratically elected, they don’t serve any limited term. They essentially answer to no one, except their own boards. They are the power behind this. Today, corporations exist for the primary purpose of making large profits, making a few very rich people a lot richer. That shouldn’t be.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park
Tuesday, February 05, 2008
Obama
February 05
Obama
Obama
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/02/05/18477126.php
Obama
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77 [at] aol.com )
Tuesday Feb 5th, 2008 9:20 AM
I am voted for Barack Obama. But there is another side to the story!
"In the U.S., we know that the next two final presidential candidates, Republican and Democrat alike, are going to each have to raise something like half a billion dollars. And that's not going to come from me and you. Primarily that's going to come from the people who own and run our big corporations. So the G8 is this group of countries that represent the biggest multinational corporations in the world and really serve at their behest.--It doesn't really matter whether we have a Democrat or a Republican in the White House or running Congress; the empire goes on, because it's really run by what I call the corporatocracy, which is a group of men who run our biggest corporations. They really are the equivalent of the emperor, because they do not serve at the wish of the people, they're not democratically elected, they don't serve any limited term. They essentially answer to no one, except their own boards. They are the power behind this. Today corporations exist for the primary purpose of making large profits, making a few very rich people a lot richer. That shouldn't be."John Perkins,"The Secret History of the American Empire: Economic Hit Men, Jackals, and the Truth about Global "
The rich of the world were eager to loan money to the poor nations of the world, for the money came with strings—strings which would become chains of immense debt over time. After the poor nations had spent their loans, often squandering them at the economic marketplaces of the rich nations, they had little to repay them with. But the interest was due month after month, year after year, and that often required taking out more loans, with more interest, and growing indebtedness, dependence, poverty, and economic slavery.
Ted Rudow III,MA
The Stanford Daily
Opinions
Tuesday February 5, 2008
Home
Other Issues
«Previous
Archives
This Issue
Front page
News
Sports
Opinions
Stu's Views: Hillary Clinton for president?
February 5, 2008
By Stuart Baimel
"Clinton, compared to Obama, has shown herself to be far humbler(?) in her ambitions for the presidency, focusing on solutions and results rather than grand, gauzy rhetoric.--The American people will find a Hillary Clinton presidency to be humble(?) and bipartisan, much like her seven and a half years in the Senate. -------
Ted Rudow III,MA
I am voted for Barack Obama. But there is another side to the story!
"In the U.S., we know that the next two final presidential candidates, Republican and Democrat alike, are going to each have to raise something like half a billion dollars. And that's not going to come from me and you. Primarily that's going to come from the people who own and run our big corporations. So the G8 is this group of countries that represent the biggest multinational corporations in the world and really serve at their behest.--It doesn't really matter whether we have a Democrat or a Republican in the White House or running Congress; the empire goes on, because it's really run by what I call the corporatocracy, which is a group of men who run our biggest corporations. They really are the equivalent of the emperor, because they do not serve at the wish of the people, they're not democratically elected, they don't serve any limited term. They essentially answer to no one, except their own boards. They are the power behind this. Today corporations exist for the primary purpose of making large profits, making a few very rich people a lot richer. That shouldn't be."John Perkins,"The Secret History of the American Empire: Economic Hit Men, Jackals, and the Truth about Global "
The rich of the world were eager to loan money to the poor nations of the world, for the money came with strings—strings which would become chains of immense debt over time. After the poor nations had spent their loans, often squandering them at the economic marketplaces of the rich nations, they had little to repay them with. But the interest was due month after month, year after year, and that often required taking out more loans, with more interest, and growing indebtedness, dependence, poverty, and economic slavery.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Obama
Spartan Daily - Serving San Jose State University since 1934
News
Opinion
Sports
Student Culture
Tuesday, February 5, 2008
Obama for president: It's no 'fairy tale'
Abstract:
He stands tall and proud on podiums during state primaries and caucuses, both in victory and defeat.
His ebullient smile and flaming confidence are invariable constants, despite the oppositions, despite the setbacks and despite America's critical wariness in envisioning him sitting in the Oval Office....
Post Comment
Go to Article
Comments in Other Articles
RSS Feed
Ted Rudow III,MA
I am voted for Barack Obama. But there is another to the story! "In the U.S., we know that the next two final presidential candidates, Republican and Democrat alike, are going to each have to raise something like half a billion dollars. And that's not going to come from me and you. Primarily that's going to come from the people who own and run our big corporations. So the G8 is this group of countries that represent the biggest multinational corporations in the world and really serve at their behest.--It doesn't really matter whether we have a Democrat or a Republican in the White House or running Congress; the empire goes on, because it's really run by what I call the corporatocracy, which is a group of men who run our biggest corporations. They really are the equivalent of the emperor, because they do not serve at the wish of the people, they're not democratically elected, they don't serve any limited term. They essentially answer to no one, except their own boards. They are the power behind this. Today corporations exist for the primary purpose of making large profits, making a few very rich people a lot richer. That shouldn't be."John Perkins,"The Secret History of the American Empire: Economic Hit Men, Jackals, and the Truth about Global "
The rich of the world were eager to loan money to the poor nations of the world, for the money came with strings--strings which would become chains of immense debt over time. After the poor nations had spent their loans, often squandering them at the economic marketplaces of the rich nations, they had little to repay them with. But the interest was due month after month, year after year, and that often required taking out more loans, with more interest, and growing indebtedness, dependence, poverty, and economic slavery.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Class of 1996
Obama
Obama
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/02/05/18477126.php
Obama
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77 [at] aol.com )
Tuesday Feb 5th, 2008 9:20 AM
I am voted for Barack Obama. But there is another side to the story!
"In the U.S., we know that the next two final presidential candidates, Republican and Democrat alike, are going to each have to raise something like half a billion dollars. And that's not going to come from me and you. Primarily that's going to come from the people who own and run our big corporations. So the G8 is this group of countries that represent the biggest multinational corporations in the world and really serve at their behest.--It doesn't really matter whether we have a Democrat or a Republican in the White House or running Congress; the empire goes on, because it's really run by what I call the corporatocracy, which is a group of men who run our biggest corporations. They really are the equivalent of the emperor, because they do not serve at the wish of the people, they're not democratically elected, they don't serve any limited term. They essentially answer to no one, except their own boards. They are the power behind this. Today corporations exist for the primary purpose of making large profits, making a few very rich people a lot richer. That shouldn't be."John Perkins,"The Secret History of the American Empire: Economic Hit Men, Jackals, and the Truth about Global "
The rich of the world were eager to loan money to the poor nations of the world, for the money came with strings—strings which would become chains of immense debt over time. After the poor nations had spent their loans, often squandering them at the economic marketplaces of the rich nations, they had little to repay them with. But the interest was due month after month, year after year, and that often required taking out more loans, with more interest, and growing indebtedness, dependence, poverty, and economic slavery.
Ted Rudow III,MA
The Stanford Daily
Opinions
Tuesday February 5, 2008
Home
Other Issues
«Previous
Archives
This Issue
Front page
News
Sports
Opinions
Stu's Views: Hillary Clinton for president?
February 5, 2008
By Stuart Baimel
"Clinton, compared to Obama, has shown herself to be far humbler(?) in her ambitions for the presidency, focusing on solutions and results rather than grand, gauzy rhetoric.--The American people will find a Hillary Clinton presidency to be humble(?) and bipartisan, much like her seven and a half years in the Senate. -------
Ted Rudow III,MA
I am voted for Barack Obama. But there is another side to the story!
"In the U.S., we know that the next two final presidential candidates, Republican and Democrat alike, are going to each have to raise something like half a billion dollars. And that's not going to come from me and you. Primarily that's going to come from the people who own and run our big corporations. So the G8 is this group of countries that represent the biggest multinational corporations in the world and really serve at their behest.--It doesn't really matter whether we have a Democrat or a Republican in the White House or running Congress; the empire goes on, because it's really run by what I call the corporatocracy, which is a group of men who run our biggest corporations. They really are the equivalent of the emperor, because they do not serve at the wish of the people, they're not democratically elected, they don't serve any limited term. They essentially answer to no one, except their own boards. They are the power behind this. Today corporations exist for the primary purpose of making large profits, making a few very rich people a lot richer. That shouldn't be."John Perkins,"The Secret History of the American Empire: Economic Hit Men, Jackals, and the Truth about Global "
The rich of the world were eager to loan money to the poor nations of the world, for the money came with strings—strings which would become chains of immense debt over time. After the poor nations had spent their loans, often squandering them at the economic marketplaces of the rich nations, they had little to repay them with. But the interest was due month after month, year after year, and that often required taking out more loans, with more interest, and growing indebtedness, dependence, poverty, and economic slavery.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Obama
Spartan Daily - Serving San Jose State University since 1934
News
Opinion
Sports
Student Culture
Tuesday, February 5, 2008
Obama for president: It's no 'fairy tale'
Abstract:
He stands tall and proud on podiums during state primaries and caucuses, both in victory and defeat.
His ebullient smile and flaming confidence are invariable constants, despite the oppositions, despite the setbacks and despite America's critical wariness in envisioning him sitting in the Oval Office....
Post Comment
Go to Article
Comments in Other Articles
RSS Feed
Ted Rudow III,MA
I am voted for Barack Obama. But there is another to the story! "In the U.S., we know that the next two final presidential candidates, Republican and Democrat alike, are going to each have to raise something like half a billion dollars. And that's not going to come from me and you. Primarily that's going to come from the people who own and run our big corporations. So the G8 is this group of countries that represent the biggest multinational corporations in the world and really serve at their behest.--It doesn't really matter whether we have a Democrat or a Republican in the White House or running Congress; the empire goes on, because it's really run by what I call the corporatocracy, which is a group of men who run our biggest corporations. They really are the equivalent of the emperor, because they do not serve at the wish of the people, they're not democratically elected, they don't serve any limited term. They essentially answer to no one, except their own boards. They are the power behind this. Today corporations exist for the primary purpose of making large profits, making a few very rich people a lot richer. That shouldn't be."John Perkins,"The Secret History of the American Empire: Economic Hit Men, Jackals, and the Truth about Global "
The rich of the world were eager to loan money to the poor nations of the world, for the money came with strings--strings which would become chains of immense debt over time. After the poor nations had spent their loans, often squandering them at the economic marketplaces of the rich nations, they had little to repay them with. But the interest was due month after month, year after year, and that often required taking out more loans, with more interest, and growing indebtedness, dependence, poverty, and economic slavery.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Class of 1996
Monday, February 04, 2008
U.S can't sustain
San Jose Mercury
Feb.4,2008
home
news
columns
editorials
letters
discussion boards
Submit A Letter To The Editor
E-mail your thoughts to letters@mercurynews.com. Requirements: 125 words or less; no attachments; include your name, address and daytime phone.
Letters will be edited for length and clarity. Street addresses and phone numbers are not published.
Top Classifieds
Rentals Jobs Real Estate Autos
U.S. can't sustain
deficit indefinitely
All great societies pass this way eventually, running up unsustainable debts and printing (or minting) currency in an increasingly desperate attempt to maintain the illusion of prosperity. They simply collapse under the weight of their accumulated debt, as did the United States and Europe in the 1930s, or they keep running the printing presses until their currencies become worthless and their economies fall into chaos. The United States has the biggest deficit it has ever had, amounting to nearly $9.2 trillion. There has to come a day of reckoning, and it looks like it's about to come.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park
Feb.4,2008
home
news
columns
editorials
letters
discussion boards
Submit A Letter To The Editor
E-mail your thoughts to letters@mercurynews.com. Requirements: 125 words or less; no attachments; include your name, address and daytime phone.
Letters will be edited for length and clarity. Street addresses and phone numbers are not published.
Top Classifieds
Rentals Jobs Real Estate Autos
U.S. can't sustain
deficit indefinitely
All great societies pass this way eventually, running up unsustainable debts and printing (or minting) currency in an increasingly desperate attempt to maintain the illusion of prosperity. They simply collapse under the weight of their accumulated debt, as did the United States and Europe in the 1930s, or they keep running the printing presses until their currencies become worthless and their economies fall into chaos. The United States has the biggest deficit it has ever had, amounting to nearly $9.2 trillion. There has to come a day of reckoning, and it looks like it's about to come.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park
Wednesday, January 30, 2008
Propaganda
Rich
Sacbee: Opinion Newsletter Blogs | Cartoons | Daily Debate | Editorials | Forum | Letters
Marie Cocco: Helping jobless helps economy
Wednesday, January 30, 2008
Propagada
"We must trust Americans with the responsibility of homeownership and empower them to weather turbulent times in housing market. My administration brought together the Hope Now Alliance which is helping many struggling homeowners avoid foreclosure. And Congress can help even more." Bush
"We actually saw a remarkable surge in the proportion of Americas low income families who became homeowners in the last 10 years or so. And I expect were going to see their equity almost completely wiped out, which would be a terrible tragedy for them. There's something like 2 million households going into foreclosure. The rescue packages that have been passed so far will affect about 200,000 of them, it is paltry."
Katherine Newman
The great and powerful rich, propaganda and advertising, that they even convinced lots of poor people that they were right and persuaded them to voluntarily give up some of the few things they had to make them even poorer and the rich even richer.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Changes
Sacbee: Opinion Newsletter Blogs | Cartoons | Daily Debate | Editorials | Forum | Letters
Editorial: Bush's speech unintentionally captures reality
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
Changes
Changes in man's society always come from the bottom, not the top--changes in economics, politics, or religion, or the earth--because the top does not want to change; it always wants to be on the top. But if they try to seal the pot to preserve the status quo, they cannot, and the pot will explode and destroy because of the fire. There must be this continual change; otherwise there would be stagnation. There must be this constant circulation or there would be total stagnation and corruption, because that which is at the top is the first to ferment, to sour, to rot, and that which is on the bottom is full of dregs, which if allowed to accumulate would solidify and clot the circulatory process, and that which is on the top would become scum and froth and, as in the brewing of a good beverage, it must be constantly stirred to prevent the settling of the dregs or the accumulation of scum, and to insure the equal distribution of all properties concerned, there must be constant change and constant stirring and constant circulation to prevent stagnation--either by fire or by sword.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Sacbee: Opinion Newsletter Blogs | Cartoons | Daily Debate | Editorials | Forum | Letters
Marie Cocco: Helping jobless helps economy
Wednesday, January 30, 2008
Propagada
"We must trust Americans with the responsibility of homeownership and empower them to weather turbulent times in housing market. My administration brought together the Hope Now Alliance which is helping many struggling homeowners avoid foreclosure. And Congress can help even more." Bush
"We actually saw a remarkable surge in the proportion of Americas low income families who became homeowners in the last 10 years or so. And I expect were going to see their equity almost completely wiped out, which would be a terrible tragedy for them. There's something like 2 million households going into foreclosure. The rescue packages that have been passed so far will affect about 200,000 of them, it is paltry."
Katherine Newman
The great and powerful rich, propaganda and advertising, that they even convinced lots of poor people that they were right and persuaded them to voluntarily give up some of the few things they had to make them even poorer and the rich even richer.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Changes
Sacbee: Opinion Newsletter Blogs | Cartoons | Daily Debate | Editorials | Forum | Letters
Editorial: Bush's speech unintentionally captures reality
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
Changes
Changes in man's society always come from the bottom, not the top--changes in economics, politics, or religion, or the earth--because the top does not want to change; it always wants to be on the top. But if they try to seal the pot to preserve the status quo, they cannot, and the pot will explode and destroy because of the fire. There must be this continual change; otherwise there would be stagnation. There must be this constant circulation or there would be total stagnation and corruption, because that which is at the top is the first to ferment, to sour, to rot, and that which is on the bottom is full of dregs, which if allowed to accumulate would solidify and clot the circulatory process, and that which is on the top would become scum and froth and, as in the brewing of a good beverage, it must be constantly stirred to prevent the settling of the dregs or the accumulation of scum, and to insure the equal distribution of all properties concerned, there must be constant change and constant stirring and constant circulation to prevent stagnation--either by fire or by sword.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Propaganda
Propaganda
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/01/30/18475837.php
Propaganda
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77 [at] aol.com )
Wednesday Jan 30th, 2008 9:59 AM
"We must trust Americans with the responsibility of homeownership and empower them to weather turbulent times in housing market. My administration brought together the Hope Now Alliance which is helping many struggling homeowners avoid foreclosure. And Congress can help even more.", Bush
"We actually saw a remarkable surge in the proportion of Americas’ low income families who became homeowners in the last 10 years or so. And I expect we’re going to see their equity almost completely wiped out, which would be a terrible tragedy for them. There’s something like 2 million households going into foreclosure. The rescue packages that have been passed so far will affect about 200,000 of them, it is paltry." Katherine Newman
The great and powerful rich, propaganda and advertising, that they even convinced lots of poor people that they were right and persuaded them to voluntarily give up some of the few things they had to make them even poorer and the rich even richer, so the rich could have more and more and the poor less and less. Then to brainwash the poor of any anti-rich ideas and indoctrinate them with complacency and willingness to be peaceful servants to the rich and work hard for them do all these things for them as the will of God, which to religion, is the will of the rich.
Ted Rudow III,MA
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/01/30/18475837.php
Propaganda
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77 [at] aol.com )
Wednesday Jan 30th, 2008 9:59 AM
"We must trust Americans with the responsibility of homeownership and empower them to weather turbulent times in housing market. My administration brought together the Hope Now Alliance which is helping many struggling homeowners avoid foreclosure. And Congress can help even more.", Bush
"We actually saw a remarkable surge in the proportion of Americas’ low income families who became homeowners in the last 10 years or so. And I expect we’re going to see their equity almost completely wiped out, which would be a terrible tragedy for them. There’s something like 2 million households going into foreclosure. The rescue packages that have been passed so far will affect about 200,000 of them, it is paltry." Katherine Newman
The great and powerful rich, propaganda and advertising, that they even convinced lots of poor people that they were right and persuaded them to voluntarily give up some of the few things they had to make them even poorer and the rich even richer, so the rich could have more and more and the poor less and less. Then to brainwash the poor of any anti-rich ideas and indoctrinate them with complacency and willingness to be peaceful servants to the rich and work hard for them do all these things for them as the will of God, which to religion, is the will of the rich.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
Changes
Spartan Daily - Serving San Jose State University since 1934
News
Opinion
Sports
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
Few 'Speak Up'
Abstract:
For the first "Speak Up" event at SJSU, not many students voiced their opinion on the topic "First Amendment."
Held on the Upper Pad in the Student Union, located between the first and second floors, moderator Blake Balajadia had one volunteer come up and speak his mind....
Post Comment
Go to Article
Comments in Other Articles
RSS Feed
Ted Rudow III,MA Changes in man's society always come from the bottom, not the top--changes in economics, politics, or religion, or the earth--because the top does not want to change; it always wants to be on the top. But if they try to seal the pot to preserve the status quo, they cannot, and the pot will explode and destroy because of the fire. There must be this continual change; otherwise there would be stagnation. There must be this constant circulation or there would be total stagnation and corruption, because that which is at the top is the first to ferment, to sour, to rot, and that which is on the bottom is full of dregs, which if allowed to accumulate would solidify and clot the circulatory process, and that which is on the top would become scum and froth and, as in the brewing of a good beverage, it must be constantly stirred to prevent the settling of the dregs or the accumulation of scum, and to insure the equal distribution of all properties concerned, there must be constant change and constant stirring and constant circulation to prevent stagnation--either by fire or by sword.
Ted Rudow III,MA (Class of 1996)
News
Opinion
Sports
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
Few 'Speak Up'
Abstract:
For the first "Speak Up" event at SJSU, not many students voiced their opinion on the topic "First Amendment."
Held on the Upper Pad in the Student Union, located between the first and second floors, moderator Blake Balajadia had one volunteer come up and speak his mind....
Post Comment
Go to Article
Comments in Other Articles
RSS Feed
Ted Rudow III,MA Changes in man's society always come from the bottom, not the top--changes in economics, politics, or religion, or the earth--because the top does not want to change; it always wants to be on the top. But if they try to seal the pot to preserve the status quo, they cannot, and the pot will explode and destroy because of the fire. There must be this continual change; otherwise there would be stagnation. There must be this constant circulation or there would be total stagnation and corruption, because that which is at the top is the first to ferment, to sour, to rot, and that which is on the bottom is full of dregs, which if allowed to accumulate would solidify and clot the circulatory process, and that which is on the top would become scum and froth and, as in the brewing of a good beverage, it must be constantly stirred to prevent the settling of the dregs or the accumulation of scum, and to insure the equal distribution of all properties concerned, there must be constant change and constant stirring and constant circulation to prevent stagnation--either by fire or by sword.
Ted Rudow III,MA (Class of 1996)
Monday, January 28, 2008
Charlie
The Stanford Daily
News
Monday January 28, 2008
Home
This Issue
Front page
News
Sports
Opinions
Intermission
Dining Guide
Night Life Guide
Page Two
Careers
Monday Mayhem
Classifieds
Hitchens knocks intelligent design
Atheist debates creation advocate Jay Richards in Dinkelspiel Auditorium
January 28, 2008
By Shelby Martin
During an animated debate yesterday in a packed Dinkelspiel Auditorium, atheist Christopher Hitchens and intelligent design advocate Jay Richards clashed over the evidence for God’s existence.
“Many people are deeply religious,” he said. “Are they just stupider than you?”“I think I am smarter than most people(?),” Hitchens said, but he added that religion plays an important part in human history.“Religion was our first try at philosophy, it was our first try at epistemology. It’s what we came up with when we didn’t know we lived on a round planet circling the sun.”The event was broadcast by the Church Communication Network to churches around the country. Listeners could send questions via fax or email, and audience members at Stanford could turn in written questions to be answered by the debaters.Richards stated that just as the designers of Mt. Rushmore made the monument very different from the hills around it, “intelligent agents leave markers for their design.”“The existence of a creator God is something we can discern from the world around us,” he concluded.
Hitchens disagreed."
There is no proof for evolution. It has to be believed, therefore it's a faith, therefore it's a religion! So they're teaching a new compulsory religion in today's hallowed halls of higher learning.
Even the great high priest and founding father of this new false faith, Charles Darwin himself, confessed that "the belief (note the emphasis on belief) in natural selection (evolution) must at present be grounded entirely on general considerations.
Does biological evolution exist? The surprising answer is yes! However, the type of evolution that is evident is not the evolution that is so commonly taught as fact today.There are two categories of evolution: One is called microevolution and the other macroevolution. Microevolution happens within species, when small adaptations either take place to accommodate environment or are brought about by breeding. Macroevolution is the idea that one species evolves into another, the commonly understood theory of evolution. This second type of evolution has never been observed to occur.
Once I was a tadpole long and thin, then I was a baboon with my tail tucked in, then I was a monkey in a tropical tree and now I am professor with college degree. Did Charley make a monkey out of you?
Ted Rudow III,MA
News
Monday January 28, 2008
Home
This Issue
Front page
News
Sports
Opinions
Intermission
Dining Guide
Night Life Guide
Page Two
Careers
Monday Mayhem
Classifieds
Hitchens knocks intelligent design
Atheist debates creation advocate Jay Richards in Dinkelspiel Auditorium
January 28, 2008
By Shelby Martin
During an animated debate yesterday in a packed Dinkelspiel Auditorium, atheist Christopher Hitchens and intelligent design advocate Jay Richards clashed over the evidence for God’s existence.
“Many people are deeply religious,” he said. “Are they just stupider than you?”“I think I am smarter than most people(?),” Hitchens said, but he added that religion plays an important part in human history.“Religion was our first try at philosophy, it was our first try at epistemology. It’s what we came up with when we didn’t know we lived on a round planet circling the sun.”The event was broadcast by the Church Communication Network to churches around the country. Listeners could send questions via fax or email, and audience members at Stanford could turn in written questions to be answered by the debaters.Richards stated that just as the designers of Mt. Rushmore made the monument very different from the hills around it, “intelligent agents leave markers for their design.”“The existence of a creator God is something we can discern from the world around us,” he concluded.
Hitchens disagreed."
There is no proof for evolution. It has to be believed, therefore it's a faith, therefore it's a religion! So they're teaching a new compulsory religion in today's hallowed halls of higher learning.
Even the great high priest and founding father of this new false faith, Charles Darwin himself, confessed that "the belief (note the emphasis on belief) in natural selection (evolution) must at present be grounded entirely on general considerations.
Does biological evolution exist? The surprising answer is yes! However, the type of evolution that is evident is not the evolution that is so commonly taught as fact today.There are two categories of evolution: One is called microevolution and the other macroevolution. Microevolution happens within species, when small adaptations either take place to accommodate environment or are brought about by breeding. Macroevolution is the idea that one species evolves into another, the commonly understood theory of evolution. This second type of evolution has never been observed to occur.
Once I was a tadpole long and thin, then I was a baboon with my tail tucked in, then I was a monkey in a tropical tree and now I am professor with college degree. Did Charley make a monkey out of you?
Ted Rudow III,MA
Saturday, January 26, 2008
The Daily Star
The Daily Star
Home About Us Advertise Archives Forum Classifieds ePaper Live TV Contact us
Search
Daily Star Sections
Middle East
Egypt
Lebanon
Middle East News
Politics
Business
Editorial
Opinion
Reader's Feedback Published on 12/01/2008
Readers' Letters and Opinions
letters@dailystar.com.lb
The Daily Star is pleased to provide a forum for debate on a range of subjects, from local cultural activities to international politics.
Dozens, sometimes even hundreds, of letters fall into the editor's mailbox daily. In order to keep the letters timely, The Daily Star generally produces a special letters section. When the influx of letters is particularly large, extra space is made available accordingly.
If you would like to submit a letter for publication, please remember to include your full name (first and last) and address, including city. The Daily Star only publishes letters under 400 words, and these are subject to editing. The Daily Star will not acknowledge unsolicited submissions.
Daily Star Sections
Despite their treatment, many Palestinians are simply trying to get by and to survive, but there are those who respond to violence with violence. There is terrorism on both sides. Yet it is Palestinian children who have suffered the most, endured the most hardship and pain, undergone the most torment of body and spirit. Recognition of Israel and acceptance of previous agreements and obligations such as United Nations Resolution 242 could solve the problem.
Ted Rudow III,MA
California, USA
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
The International Herald Tribune and The Daily Star are available every morning in:
Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Egypt, Qatar, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Oman
Home About Us Advertise Archives Forum Classifieds ePaper Live TV Contact us
Search
Daily Star Sections
Middle East
Egypt
Lebanon
Middle East News
Politics
Business
Editorial
Opinion
Reader's Feedback Published on 12/01/2008
Readers' Letters and Opinions
letters@dailystar.com.lb
The Daily Star is pleased to provide a forum for debate on a range of subjects, from local cultural activities to international politics.
Dozens, sometimes even hundreds, of letters fall into the editor's mailbox daily. In order to keep the letters timely, The Daily Star generally produces a special letters section. When the influx of letters is particularly large, extra space is made available accordingly.
If you would like to submit a letter for publication, please remember to include your full name (first and last) and address, including city. The Daily Star only publishes letters under 400 words, and these are subject to editing. The Daily Star will not acknowledge unsolicited submissions.
Daily Star Sections
Despite their treatment, many Palestinians are simply trying to get by and to survive, but there are those who respond to violence with violence. There is terrorism on both sides. Yet it is Palestinian children who have suffered the most, endured the most hardship and pain, undergone the most torment of body and spirit. Recognition of Israel and acceptance of previous agreements and obligations such as United Nations Resolution 242 could solve the problem.
Ted Rudow III,MA
California, USA
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
The International Herald Tribune and The Daily Star are available every morning in:
Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Egypt, Qatar, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Oman
Friday, January 25, 2008
Crash?
Friday, January 25, 2008
Washington
New York Times
World
U.S.
N.Y. / Region
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
Opinion
Arts
Style
Travel
Jobs
Real Estate
Autos
Politics
Washington
readers' comments
Tentative Deal Reached on Stimulus Plan
Back to Article »
January 24th, 2008 1:37 pmLink
It's a time of reflection for many in the selfish western world but also the towers of democracy and of the free world. They have only begun to witness the great destruction that will fall upon them.
The economies will fall now. They will come up for a few more gasps of air, but this has been the fatal blow that will bring them down. There's still a little time left in which the economies will float above the crisis, but not for long. It's more as I said--they will be surfacing for gasps of air, but then submerging again, much as a drowning man who goes down longer and longer after each desperate gasp at the surface, until he surfaces no more.
Why you say? How else were they going to get the world to fall into their hands and beg for more restrictions that will keep them safe--but at the same time drive them deeper into the web of bondage that the Big-Business billonaire boys whose multi-billionaire corporations are booming because of these economic policies now have spun for them?
— Ted Rudow III,MA, Menlo Park,CA
Washington
New York Times
World
U.S.
N.Y. / Region
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
Opinion
Arts
Style
Travel
Jobs
Real Estate
Autos
Politics
Washington
readers' comments
Tentative Deal Reached on Stimulus Plan
Back to Article »
January 24th, 2008 1:37 pmLink
It's a time of reflection for many in the selfish western world but also the towers of democracy and of the free world. They have only begun to witness the great destruction that will fall upon them.
The economies will fall now. They will come up for a few more gasps of air, but this has been the fatal blow that will bring them down. There's still a little time left in which the economies will float above the crisis, but not for long. It's more as I said--they will be surfacing for gasps of air, but then submerging again, much as a drowning man who goes down longer and longer after each desperate gasp at the surface, until he surfaces no more.
Why you say? How else were they going to get the world to fall into their hands and beg for more restrictions that will keep them safe--but at the same time drive them deeper into the web of bondage that the Big-Business billonaire boys whose multi-billionaire corporations are booming because of these economic policies now have spun for them?
— Ted Rudow III,MA, Menlo Park,CA
Thursday, January 24, 2008
Crash?
Sacbee: Opinion Newsletter Blogs | Cartoons | Daily Debate | Editorials | Forum | Letters
Editorial: Economy requires long-term and short-term fixes?
Both quick stimulus, financial reforms are needed to deal with current downturn
Thursday, January 24, 2008
Story appeared in EDITORIALS section,
Crash
It's a time of reflection for many in the selfish western world but also the towers of democracy and of the free world. They have only begun to witness the great destruction that will fall upon them.
The economies will fall now. They will come up for a few more gasps of air, but this has been the fatal blow that will bring them down. There's still a little time left in which the economies will float above the crisis, but not for long. It's more as I said--they will be surfacing for gasps of air, but then submerging again, much as a drowning man who goes down longer and longer after each desperate gasp at the surface, until he surfaces no more.
Why you say? How else were they going to get the world to fall into their hands and beg for more restrictions that will keep them safe--but at the same time drive them deeper into the web of bondage that the Big-Business billonaire boys whose multi-billionaire corporations are booming because of these economic policies now have spun for them?
Ted Rudow III,MA
Editorial: Economy requires long-term and short-term fixes?
Both quick stimulus, financial reforms are needed to deal with current downturn
Thursday, January 24, 2008
Story appeared in EDITORIALS section,
Crash
It's a time of reflection for many in the selfish western world but also the towers of democracy and of the free world. They have only begun to witness the great destruction that will fall upon them.
The economies will fall now. They will come up for a few more gasps of air, but this has been the fatal blow that will bring them down. There's still a little time left in which the economies will float above the crisis, but not for long. It's more as I said--they will be surfacing for gasps of air, but then submerging again, much as a drowning man who goes down longer and longer after each desperate gasp at the surface, until he surfaces no more.
Why you say? How else were they going to get the world to fall into their hands and beg for more restrictions that will keep them safe--but at the same time drive them deeper into the web of bondage that the Big-Business billonaire boys whose multi-billionaire corporations are booming because of these economic policies now have spun for them?
Ted Rudow III,MA
Tuesday, January 22, 2008
Deserving to be apathetic?
The Stanford Daily
Opinions
Monday January 21, 2008
Home
Front page
News
Sports
Opinions
Students Illustrated: Deserving to be apathetic?
January 21, 2008
By Laura Holmes
Ted Rudow III,MA
One can see what American presidential politics has become, even American politics as a whole: You’re allowed to vote for the candidates chosen by big business, those who will implement policies favorable to them, whether it’s in the public interest or not. Is it any wonder that many Americans are now choosing to vote for “none of the above?”
But if they really wanted to change things, they always could. If they’re not happy with the candidates who are chosen for them, they could always choose their own and vote for them, and “throw the [present] rascals out,” as they used to say.
People don’t do so because they’ve just sunk down into lethargy. It’s too much work, too much trouble, too much expense and too big a fight against big business, big media and big polls that predict such independent candidates “don’t have a chance.”
Opinions
Monday January 21, 2008
Home
Front page
News
Sports
Opinions
Students Illustrated: Deserving to be apathetic?
January 21, 2008
By Laura Holmes
Ted Rudow III,MA
One can see what American presidential politics has become, even American politics as a whole: You’re allowed to vote for the candidates chosen by big business, those who will implement policies favorable to them, whether it’s in the public interest or not. Is it any wonder that many Americans are now choosing to vote for “none of the above?”
But if they really wanted to change things, they always could. If they’re not happy with the candidates who are chosen for them, they could always choose their own and vote for them, and “throw the [present] rascals out,” as they used to say.
People don’t do so because they’ve just sunk down into lethargy. It’s too much work, too much trouble, too much expense and too big a fight against big business, big media and big polls that predict such independent candidates “don’t have a chance.”
Monday, January 21, 2008
Witchcraft
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/01/21/18473849.php
Witchcraft
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77 [at] aol.com )
Monday Jan 21st, 2008 11:52 AM
"President Bush, who will go down in history as the great tax cutter, owes almost all of his fortune to a tax increase that was funneled into his pocket.
What happened is, an oil man named Eddie Chiles wanted to sell his money-losing Texas Rangers baseball team. So George Bush put together a group of very wealthy investors to buy the team. He put up himself $600,000 of borrowed money. The partners then gave him a 10 percent stake as the managing partner.Then they held a special election in January of the year in question to increase the sales tax in the town of Arlington, Texas, by one half-cent. That money was used to build a new baseball stadium. It’s an incredibly nice baseball stadium.--
The value of this subsidy, according to Ray Hutchison, who is the husband of Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, is a prominent Republican insider in Texas and is the leading authority on municipal bond finance in Texas, was $202.5 million. The profit that President Bush and his partners made when they sold the team was $164 million. What does that tell you? Every single penny of additional money President Bush got from that investment, his gain, came from the taxpayers. He did not add one cent to the value of that team through his skill as an MBA manager. This gets repeated all over the country.----But because it was coveted by President Bush and his friends, and they were unwilling to go into the market and buy it through market economics. So the government seized this land."
David Cay Johnston, Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalist.
A perfect picture of the certain self-destruction of corrupt Capitalism by its own selfish weakness and rottenness and cruelty, as predicted by both Marx and the Bible! So there you have it, in the plain Words of Scripture, especially in Revelation 17 and 18!--Read it! And even so shall be her own destruction!For thy merchants were the great men of the Earth, and by thy sorceries (the deceitfulness of riches and the witchcraft of wealth!) were all nations deceived! (American affluence is the dream of every country the world over, and her luxuries, sins and violence, from her music to her crimes, are imitated by nations around the world!
Ted Rudow III,MA
Witchcraft
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77 [at] aol.com )
Monday Jan 21st, 2008 11:52 AM
"President Bush, who will go down in history as the great tax cutter, owes almost all of his fortune to a tax increase that was funneled into his pocket.
What happened is, an oil man named Eddie Chiles wanted to sell his money-losing Texas Rangers baseball team. So George Bush put together a group of very wealthy investors to buy the team. He put up himself $600,000 of borrowed money. The partners then gave him a 10 percent stake as the managing partner.Then they held a special election in January of the year in question to increase the sales tax in the town of Arlington, Texas, by one half-cent. That money was used to build a new baseball stadium. It’s an incredibly nice baseball stadium.--
The value of this subsidy, according to Ray Hutchison, who is the husband of Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, is a prominent Republican insider in Texas and is the leading authority on municipal bond finance in Texas, was $202.5 million. The profit that President Bush and his partners made when they sold the team was $164 million. What does that tell you? Every single penny of additional money President Bush got from that investment, his gain, came from the taxpayers. He did not add one cent to the value of that team through his skill as an MBA manager. This gets repeated all over the country.----But because it was coveted by President Bush and his friends, and they were unwilling to go into the market and buy it through market economics. So the government seized this land."
David Cay Johnston, Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalist.
A perfect picture of the certain self-destruction of corrupt Capitalism by its own selfish weakness and rottenness and cruelty, as predicted by both Marx and the Bible! So there you have it, in the plain Words of Scripture, especially in Revelation 17 and 18!--Read it! And even so shall be her own destruction!For thy merchants were the great men of the Earth, and by thy sorceries (the deceitfulness of riches and the witchcraft of wealth!) were all nations deceived! (American affluence is the dream of every country the world over, and her luxuries, sins and violence, from her music to her crimes, are imitated by nations around the world!
Ted Rudow III,MA
Sunday, January 20, 2008
Suffered the most
Suffered the most
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/01/20/18473634.php
Palestine children
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77 [at] aol.com )
Sunday Jan 20th, 2008 10:05 AM
United Nations officials implored Israel to reverse its decision Friday to seal all border crossings with the Gaza Strip, warning that the violence in the region and cutoff of crucial supplies for 1.4 million Palestinians was provoking a humanitarian crisis.
The Defense Ministry closed all border crossings with Gaza on Friday and prevented the delivery of a United Nations aid shipment. Only humanitarian cases given Defense Minister Ehud Barak`s personal approval would be allowed through, the ministry said. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said. `If this situation endures, the closure will also cause further shortages of food, medical and relief items in the Gaza Strip.`
Despite their treatment, many of the Palestinians simply try to get by, to survive, but there are those who respond to violence with violence. There is terrorism on both sides. Yet it is Palestinian children who have suffered the most, endured the most hardship and pain, and undergone the most torment of body and spirit. Recognition of Israel, and acceptance of previous agreements and obligations( UN 242) could solve the problem!
Ted Rudow III,MA
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/01/20/18473634.php
Palestine children
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77 [at] aol.com )
Sunday Jan 20th, 2008 10:05 AM
United Nations officials implored Israel to reverse its decision Friday to seal all border crossings with the Gaza Strip, warning that the violence in the region and cutoff of crucial supplies for 1.4 million Palestinians was provoking a humanitarian crisis.
The Defense Ministry closed all border crossings with Gaza on Friday and prevented the delivery of a United Nations aid shipment. Only humanitarian cases given Defense Minister Ehud Barak`s personal approval would be allowed through, the ministry said. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said. `If this situation endures, the closure will also cause further shortages of food, medical and relief items in the Gaza Strip.`
Despite their treatment, many of the Palestinians simply try to get by, to survive, but there are those who respond to violence with violence. There is terrorism on both sides. Yet it is Palestinian children who have suffered the most, endured the most hardship and pain, and undergone the most torment of body and spirit. Recognition of Israel, and acceptance of previous agreements and obligations( UN 242) could solve the problem!
Ted Rudow III,MA
Friday, January 18, 2008
Real root causes
San Francisco Examiner
California |Change My City
Now | Forecast 59/44
Jan. 18, 2008
Print Edition | Marketplace
World
White House
N. Korea
Iraq
Iran
Editorial
Letters
Ken Garcia San Francisco Home > Opinion > Letters
Article Examiner
President Bush used his speech in Abu Dhabi on Sunday to reiterate many of the same accusations about Iran that we have heard him throw around. Bush is entitled to his warped opinions about Iran, but his message would have been better-suited for delivery to his deluded cronies in the White House than to his wiser allies in the Gulf.
The average American might be fooled by Bush’s latest attempt to lump al-Qaida, “freedom-haters,” Hamas, Hezbollah, the Taliban, Iraqi insurgents and Iran into the same lot, but the people of this region have a much better understanding of these phenomenons and forces. They fortunately also have a better sense of the real root causes of the region’s challenges, as well as the required solutions. Thus, the Iranian people can rest easily knowing that Gulf Arab leaders will respond wisely to Bush’s latest attempt to stir up mischief.
About the only friends Bush seems to have left are the big-business billionaire boys whose multibillion-dollar corporations are booming because of his economic policies.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park
California |Change My City
Now | Forecast 59/44
Jan. 18, 2008
Print Edition | Marketplace
World
White House
N. Korea
Iraq
Iran
Editorial
Letters
Ken Garcia San Francisco Home > Opinion > Letters
Article Examiner
President Bush used his speech in Abu Dhabi on Sunday to reiterate many of the same accusations about Iran that we have heard him throw around. Bush is entitled to his warped opinions about Iran, but his message would have been better-suited for delivery to his deluded cronies in the White House than to his wiser allies in the Gulf.
The average American might be fooled by Bush’s latest attempt to lump al-Qaida, “freedom-haters,” Hamas, Hezbollah, the Taliban, Iraqi insurgents and Iran into the same lot, but the people of this region have a much better understanding of these phenomenons and forces. They fortunately also have a better sense of the real root causes of the region’s challenges, as well as the required solutions. Thus, the Iranian people can rest easily knowing that Gulf Arab leaders will respond wisely to Bush’s latest attempt to stir up mischief.
About the only friends Bush seems to have left are the big-business billionaire boys whose multibillion-dollar corporations are booming because of his economic policies.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park
Wednesday, January 16, 2008
Get involved
Subj: Wednesday January 16 2008 Home Local News St
Date: 1/16/2008 7:35:05 AM Pacific Standard Time
From: Tedr77
To: babyletsdigdowndeep@yahoogroups.com
Wednesday
January
16
2008
San Mateo Daily Journal
Home
Local News
State / National / World
Sports
Opinion / Letters
Business
Arts / Entertainment
Lifestyle
Obituaries
About Us
Letters to the editor
Get involved for change
Editor,
Regarding Jon Mays’ column “The shallow race for the presidency” in the Jan. 11 edition of the Daily Journal, one can see what American presidential politics has become, even American politics as a whole: You’re allowed to vote for the candidates chosen by big business, those who will implement policies favorable to them, whether it’s in the public interest or not. Is it any wonder that many Americans are now choosing to vote for “none of the above?”
But if they really wanted to change things, they always could. If they’re not happy with the candidates who are chosen for them, they could always choose their own and vote for them, and “throw the [present] rascals out,” as they used to say.
People don’t do so because they’ve just sunk down into lethargy. It’s too much work, too much trouble, too much expense and too big a fight against big business, big media and big polls that predict such independent candidates “don’t have a chance.”
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park
Date: 1/16/2008 7:35:05 AM Pacific Standard Time
From: Tedr77
To: babyletsdigdowndeep@yahoogroups.com
Wednesday
January
16
2008
San Mateo Daily Journal
Home
Local News
State / National / World
Sports
Opinion / Letters
Business
Arts / Entertainment
Lifestyle
Obituaries
About Us
Letters to the editor
Get involved for change
Editor,
Regarding Jon Mays’ column “The shallow race for the presidency” in the Jan. 11 edition of the Daily Journal, one can see what American presidential politics has become, even American politics as a whole: You’re allowed to vote for the candidates chosen by big business, those who will implement policies favorable to them, whether it’s in the public interest or not. Is it any wonder that many Americans are now choosing to vote for “none of the above?”
But if they really wanted to change things, they always could. If they’re not happy with the candidates who are chosen for them, they could always choose their own and vote for them, and “throw the [present] rascals out,” as they used to say.
People don’t do so because they’ve just sunk down into lethargy. It’s too much work, too much trouble, too much expense and too big a fight against big business, big media and big polls that predict such independent candidates “don’t have a chance.”
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park
Friday, January 11, 2008
The Daily Star
The Daily Star
Home About Us Advertise Archives Forum Classifieds ePaper Live TV Contact us
Search
Daily Star Sections
Middle East
Egypt
Lebanon
Middle East News
Politics
Business
Editorial
Opinion
Reader's Feedback Published on 12/01/2008
Readers' Letters and Opinions
letters@dailystar.com.lb
The Daily Star is pleased to provide a forum for debate on a range of subjects, from local cultural activities to international politics.
Dozens, sometimes even hundreds, of letters fall into the editor's mailbox daily. In order to keep the letters timely, The Daily Star generally produces a special letters section. When the influx of letters is particularly large, extra space is made available accordingly.
If you would like to submit a letter for publication, please remember to include your full name (first and last) and address, including city. The Daily Star only publishes letters under 400 words, and these are subject to editing. The Daily Star will not acknowledge unsolicited submissions.
Daily Star staff
"US plays up, Iran plays down naval incident in Gulf"
January 8, 2008
They're so ignorant of the rest of the world, the last thing they need to be doing is meddling in Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq and the Middle East. As the old saying goes, "power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." When it does, then things can get pretty nasty. America's trying to remake the world in its own image with its own form of government, but different peoples and nations simply need different forms of government. We need to get our own house in order!
Ted Rudow III,MA
California, USA
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
The International Herald Tribune and The Daily Star are available every morning in:
Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Egypt, Qatar, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Oman
Thursday, January 10, 2008
Change?
San Francisco Examiner
California |Change My City
Now | Forecast 54/50
Jan.10,2008
Print Edition | Marketplace
|
Opinion
US
World
Local Politics
|
Ken Garcia
|
White House
|
N. Korea
|
Iraq
San Francisco Home > Opinion > Letters
Article Examiner
Get involved for change
One can see what American presidential politics has become, even American politics as a whole: You’re allowed to vote for the candidates chosen by big business, those who will implement policies favorable to them, whether it’s in the public interest or not. Is it any wonder that many Americans are now choosing to vote for “none of the above”?
But if they really wanted to change things, they always could. If they’re not happy with the candidates who are chosen for them, they could always choose their own and vote for them, and “throw the [present] rascals out,” as they used to say.
People don’t do so because they’ve just sunk down into lethargy. It’s too much work, too much trouble, too much expense and too big a fight against big business, big media, and big polls that predict such independent candidates “don’t have a chance.”
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park
Home About Us Advertise Archives Forum Classifieds ePaper Live TV Contact us
Search
Daily Star Sections
Middle East
Egypt
Lebanon
Middle East News
Politics
Business
Editorial
Opinion
Reader's Feedback Published on 12/01/2008
Readers' Letters and Opinions
letters@dailystar.com.lb
The Daily Star is pleased to provide a forum for debate on a range of subjects, from local cultural activities to international politics.
Dozens, sometimes even hundreds, of letters fall into the editor's mailbox daily. In order to keep the letters timely, The Daily Star generally produces a special letters section. When the influx of letters is particularly large, extra space is made available accordingly.
If you would like to submit a letter for publication, please remember to include your full name (first and last) and address, including city. The Daily Star only publishes letters under 400 words, and these are subject to editing. The Daily Star will not acknowledge unsolicited submissions.
Daily Star staff
"US plays up, Iran plays down naval incident in Gulf"
January 8, 2008
They're so ignorant of the rest of the world, the last thing they need to be doing is meddling in Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq and the Middle East. As the old saying goes, "power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." When it does, then things can get pretty nasty. America's trying to remake the world in its own image with its own form of government, but different peoples and nations simply need different forms of government. We need to get our own house in order!
Ted Rudow III,MA
California, USA
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
The International Herald Tribune and The Daily Star are available every morning in:
Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Egypt, Qatar, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Oman
Thursday, January 10, 2008
Change?
San Francisco Examiner
California |Change My City
Now | Forecast 54/50
Jan.10,2008
Print Edition | Marketplace
|
Opinion
US
World
Local Politics
|
Ken Garcia
|
White House
|
N. Korea
|
Iraq
San Francisco Home > Opinion > Letters
Article Examiner
Get involved for change
One can see what American presidential politics has become, even American politics as a whole: You’re allowed to vote for the candidates chosen by big business, those who will implement policies favorable to them, whether it’s in the public interest or not. Is it any wonder that many Americans are now choosing to vote for “none of the above”?
But if they really wanted to change things, they always could. If they’re not happy with the candidates who are chosen for them, they could always choose their own and vote for them, and “throw the [present] rascals out,” as they used to say.
People don’t do so because they’ve just sunk down into lethargy. It’s too much work, too much trouble, too much expense and too big a fight against big business, big media, and big polls that predict such independent candidates “don’t have a chance.”
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park
Wednesday, January 09, 2008
Madeleine K. Albright: End politics of fear and return confidence?
Madeleine K. Albright: End politics of fear and return confidence?
Tuesday, January 8, 2008
Change?
So you can see what American presidential politics has become--even American politics as a whole: You're allowed to vote for the candidates chosen by big business, those who will implement policies favorable to them, whether it's in the public interest or not. Is it any wonder that many Americans are now choosing to vote for "none of the above"? But if they really wanted to change things, they always could. If they're not happy with the candidates that are chosen for them, they could always choose their own and vote for them, and "throw the [present] rascals out," as they used to say. People don't do so because they've just sunk down into lethargy. It's too much work, too much trouble, too much expense, and too big a fight against big business, big media, and big polls that predict such independent candidates "don't have a chance."
Ted Rudow III,MA
Tuesday, January 8, 2008
Change?
So you can see what American presidential politics has become--even American politics as a whole: You're allowed to vote for the candidates chosen by big business, those who will implement policies favorable to them, whether it's in the public interest or not. Is it any wonder that many Americans are now choosing to vote for "none of the above"? But if they really wanted to change things, they always could. If they're not happy with the candidates that are chosen for them, they could always choose their own and vote for them, and "throw the [present] rascals out," as they used to say. People don't do so because they've just sunk down into lethargy. It's too much work, too much trouble, too much expense, and too big a fight against big business, big media, and big polls that predict such independent candidates "don't have a chance."
Ted Rudow III,MA
Huckabee
San Mateo Daily Journal
Jan.9,2008
Home
Local News
State / National / World
Sports
Opinion / Letters
Business
Arts / Entertainment
Community Forum
Archives
Advertise With Us
About Us
Letters to the editor
Huckabee deceived electors
Editor,
Mike Huckabee, a preacher turned politician, handily defeated Mitt Romney despite being outspent by tens of millions of dollars and deciding in the campaign’s final days to scrap television commercials that would have assailed the former Massachusetts governor.
“No man that warreth entangleth himself with the affairs of this World, that he may please Him Who hath called him to be a soldier!” (2 Timothy 2:4) Then came the illustration where Lot had become a judge in Sodom, which means a politician or a ruler there, and by being there he was actually hindering the Will of God in trying to save Sodom.
“God told him to be a soldier of the Lord, to win souls and not to save their bodies and their self-indulgent, rich, luxurious lives which have so little and no concern for the billions of poor of the World! Talk about the very elect being deceived” (Matthew 24:24).
Oh, they are so deceived. It obviously is possible. It’s as though the Lord is amazed and astonished that the elect could be so deceived, that it is possible for the elect to be so deceived. Why did the Lord give so many warnings about false christs and false prophets if it were not possible for the elect to be deceived? — When they are obviously so deceived.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Jan.9,2008
Home
Local News
State / National / World
Sports
Opinion / Letters
Business
Arts / Entertainment
Community Forum
Archives
Advertise With Us
About Us
Letters to the editor
Huckabee deceived electors
Editor,
Mike Huckabee, a preacher turned politician, handily defeated Mitt Romney despite being outspent by tens of millions of dollars and deciding in the campaign’s final days to scrap television commercials that would have assailed the former Massachusetts governor.
“No man that warreth entangleth himself with the affairs of this World, that he may please Him Who hath called him to be a soldier!” (2 Timothy 2:4) Then came the illustration where Lot had become a judge in Sodom, which means a politician or a ruler there, and by being there he was actually hindering the Will of God in trying to save Sodom.
“God told him to be a soldier of the Lord, to win souls and not to save their bodies and their self-indulgent, rich, luxurious lives which have so little and no concern for the billions of poor of the World! Talk about the very elect being deceived” (Matthew 24:24).
Oh, they are so deceived. It obviously is possible. It’s as though the Lord is amazed and astonished that the elect could be so deceived, that it is possible for the elect to be so deceived. Why did the Lord give so many warnings about false christs and false prophets if it were not possible for the elect to be deceived? — When they are obviously so deceived.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Tuesday, January 08, 2008
Change?
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/01/08/18471073.php
Change?
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77 [at] aol.com )
Tuesday Jan 8th, 2008 1:20 PM
So you can see what American presidential politics has become--even American politics as a whole: You're allowed to vote for the candidates chosen by big business, those who will implement policies favorable to them, whether it's in the public interest or not.
Is it any wonder that many Americans are now choosing to vote for "none of the above"?
But if they really wanted to change things, they always could. If they're not happy with the candidates that are chosen for them, they could always choose their own and vote for them, and "throw the [present] rascals out," as they used to say. People don't do so because they've just sunk down into lethargy. It's too much work, too much trouble, too much expense, and too big a fight against big business, big media, and big polls that predict such independent candidates "don't have a chance."
Ted Rudow III,MA
Change?
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77 [at] aol.com )
Tuesday Jan 8th, 2008 1:20 PM
So you can see what American presidential politics has become--even American politics as a whole: You're allowed to vote for the candidates chosen by big business, those who will implement policies favorable to them, whether it's in the public interest or not.
Is it any wonder that many Americans are now choosing to vote for "none of the above"?
But if they really wanted to change things, they always could. If they're not happy with the candidates that are chosen for them, they could always choose their own and vote for them, and "throw the [present] rascals out," as they used to say. People don't do so because they've just sunk down into lethargy. It's too much work, too much trouble, too much expense, and too big a fight against big business, big media, and big polls that predict such independent candidates "don't have a chance."
Ted Rudow III,MA
Change?
The Stanford Daily
Opinions
Tuesday January 8, 2008
Home
Front page
News
Sports
Opinions
Classifieds
Subscriptions
New building!
About
Editorial: Priming for primaries
January 8, 2008
By Editorial Board
"Iowa is an overwhelmingly white state with fiercely liberal Democrats and socially conservative Republicans. New Hampshire — whose state motto is, famously, “Live Free or Die” — is a haven for independents who are rabidly antitax. Another early primary state, South Carolina, has a higher percentage of black voters than most other states in the Union.Our electoral system has its flaws, to be sure, but with such an eclectic mix of states involved in the early primary season, the American people should be comforted to know that a wide array of voters are making informed decisions this month."
Ted Rudow III,MA
So you can see what American presidential politics has become--even American politics as a whole: You're allowed to vote for the candidates chosen by big business, those who will implement policies favorable to them, whether it's in the public interest or not. Is it any wonder that many Americans are now choosing to vote for "none of the above"?
But if they really wanted to change things, they always could. If they're not happy with the candidates that are chosen for them, they could always choose their own and vote for them, and "throw the [present] rascals out," as they used to say. People don't do so because they've just sunk down into lethargy. It's too much work, too much trouble, too much expense, and too big a fight against big business, big media, and big polls that predict such independent candidates "don't have a chance."
Ted Rudow III,MA
Opinions
Tuesday January 8, 2008
Home
Front page
News
Sports
Opinions
Classifieds
Subscriptions
New building!
About
Editorial: Priming for primaries
January 8, 2008
By Editorial Board
"Iowa is an overwhelmingly white state with fiercely liberal Democrats and socially conservative Republicans. New Hampshire — whose state motto is, famously, “Live Free or Die” — is a haven for independents who are rabidly antitax. Another early primary state, South Carolina, has a higher percentage of black voters than most other states in the Union.Our electoral system has its flaws, to be sure, but with such an eclectic mix of states involved in the early primary season, the American people should be comforted to know that a wide array of voters are making informed decisions this month."
Ted Rudow III,MA
So you can see what American presidential politics has become--even American politics as a whole: You're allowed to vote for the candidates chosen by big business, those who will implement policies favorable to them, whether it's in the public interest or not. Is it any wonder that many Americans are now choosing to vote for "none of the above"?
But if they really wanted to change things, they always could. If they're not happy with the candidates that are chosen for them, they could always choose their own and vote for them, and "throw the [present] rascals out," as they used to say. People don't do so because they've just sunk down into lethargy. It's too much work, too much trouble, too much expense, and too big a fight against big business, big media, and big polls that predict such independent candidates "don't have a chance."
Ted Rudow III,MA
Monday, January 07, 2008
Our own house
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/01/07/18470884.php
Our own house
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77 [at] aol.com )
Monday Jan 7th, 2008 4:46 PM
Five Iranian boats made aggressive maneuvers and showed hostile intent toward three US Navy ships at the weekend in the Strait of Hormuz, a major oil shipping route in the Gulf, the Pentagon said on Monday.
The Pentagon said the incident was serious. It described the Iranian actions as "careless, reckless and potentially hostile" and said Tehran should provide an explanation. Iran played down the incident between the two naval forces, describing the event as an "ordinary occurrence" that ended without any disturbance.
They’re so ignorant of the rest of the world, the last thing they need to be doing is meddling in Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq and the Mideast. As the old saying goes, “Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” When it does, then things can get pretty nasty.
America’s trying to remake the world in its own image with its own form of government, but different peoples and nations simply need different forms of government. We need to get our own house in order!
Ted Rudow III,MA
Our own house
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77 [at] aol.com )
Monday Jan 7th, 2008 4:46 PM
Five Iranian boats made aggressive maneuvers and showed hostile intent toward three US Navy ships at the weekend in the Strait of Hormuz, a major oil shipping route in the Gulf, the Pentagon said on Monday.
The Pentagon said the incident was serious. It described the Iranian actions as "careless, reckless and potentially hostile" and said Tehran should provide an explanation. Iran played down the incident between the two naval forces, describing the event as an "ordinary occurrence" that ended without any disturbance.
They’re so ignorant of the rest of the world, the last thing they need to be doing is meddling in Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq and the Mideast. As the old saying goes, “Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” When it does, then things can get pretty nasty.
America’s trying to remake the world in its own image with its own form of government, but different peoples and nations simply need different forms of government. We need to get our own house in order!
Ted Rudow III,MA
Huckabee
Sacbee: Opinion Newsletter Blogs | Cartoons | Daily Debate | Editorials | Forum | Letters
Monday, January 7, 2008
Huckabee
Huckabee, a preacher turned politician, handily defeated Mitt Romney despite being outspent by tens of millions of dollars and deciding in the campaign's final days to scrap television commercials that would have assailed the former Massachusetts governor. "No man that warreth entangleth himself with the affairs of this World, that he may please Him Who hath called him to be a soldier!" ( 2Tim.2:4 ) Then came the illustration where Lot had become a judge in Sodom, which means a politician or a ruler there, and by being there he was actually hindering the Will of God in trying to save Sodom! God told him to be a soldier of the Lord, to win souls and not to save their bodies and their self-indulgent, rich, luxurious lives which have so little and no concern for the billions of poor of the World!Talk about the very elect being deceived! ( Mat. 24:24 )
Ted Rudow III,MA
Monday, January 7, 2008
Huckabee
Huckabee, a preacher turned politician, handily defeated Mitt Romney despite being outspent by tens of millions of dollars and deciding in the campaign's final days to scrap television commercials that would have assailed the former Massachusetts governor. "No man that warreth entangleth himself with the affairs of this World, that he may please Him Who hath called him to be a soldier!" ( 2Tim.2:4 ) Then came the illustration where Lot had become a judge in Sodom, which means a politician or a ruler there, and by being there he was actually hindering the Will of God in trying to save Sodom! God told him to be a soldier of the Lord, to win souls and not to save their bodies and their self-indulgent, rich, luxurious lives which have so little and no concern for the billions of poor of the World!Talk about the very elect being deceived! ( Mat. 24:24 )
Ted Rudow III,MA
Thursday, January 03, 2008
Corporate greed sets tone
San Francisco Examiner
California |Change My City
Now | Forecast 57/54
58/52
53/47
Print Edition | Marketplace
News
Politics
Sports
Opinion
Editorial
Letters
Ken Garcia
San Francisco Home > Opinion > Letters
Article Examiner
Corporate greed sets tone
The more “democratic” a nation is, the closer the rich and the powerful can work together, the greater the pickings and booty available, and the fewer controls there are on their actions. The rich can grow richer and the poor can grow poorer because, after all, the rich think it’s the survival of the fittest. It’s corporate greed that has set this ugly tone.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park
California |Change My City
Now | Forecast 57/54
58/52
53/47
Print Edition | Marketplace
News
Politics
Sports
Opinion
Editorial
Letters
Ken Garcia
San Francisco Home > Opinion > Letters
Article Examiner
Corporate greed sets tone
The more “democratic” a nation is, the closer the rich and the powerful can work together, the greater the pickings and booty available, and the fewer controls there are on their actions. The rich can grow richer and the poor can grow poorer because, after all, the rich think it’s the survival of the fittest. It’s corporate greed that has set this ugly tone.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park
Wednesday, January 02, 2008
Bhutto's slaying
Sacbee: Opinion Newsletter Blogs | Cartoons | Daily Debate | Editorials | Forum | Letters
Bhutto's slaying reflects on U.S. policy
Sunday, December 30, 2007
The rich
The US is reviewing its aid to Pakistan - about $10 billion in overt funding since 2001. Yet the Bush administration may push for continuing military aid for the Pakistani Army's counterinsurgency operations, says analyst Steve Coll of the New America Foundation. President Bush is nothing but the front man for the rich to keep control. He started out as their puppet, but puppets have a funny way of getting out of hand. So something very strange is happening in the world right now! This is why so many fascist takeovers happen. This is why Hitler, Mussolini, Franco and many others came to power. The rich are clever organizers who know how to engineer a military coup as the US did in Chile, Argentina, Central America and Venezuela.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Bhutto's slaying reflects on U.S. policy
Sunday, December 30, 2007
The rich
The US is reviewing its aid to Pakistan - about $10 billion in overt funding since 2001. Yet the Bush administration may push for continuing military aid for the Pakistani Army's counterinsurgency operations, says analyst Steve Coll of the New America Foundation. President Bush is nothing but the front man for the rich to keep control. He started out as their puppet, but puppets have a funny way of getting out of hand. So something very strange is happening in the world right now! This is why so many fascist takeovers happen. This is why Hitler, Mussolini, Franco and many others came to power. The rich are clever organizers who know how to engineer a military coup as the US did in Chile, Argentina, Central America and Venezuela.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Religion of greed
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/01/02/18469690.php
Religion of greed
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77 [at] aol.com )
Wednesday Jan 2nd, 2008 11:57 AM
The more "democratic" another nation is, after all, the closer the rich and the powerful can work together, the greater the pickings and the booty available, and the less controls there are on their actions.
The rich can grow richer and the poor can grow poorer because, after all, the rich think, it's the survival of the fittest. There is no proof for evolution. It has to be believed. Therefore its a faith, therefore its a religion!
Thus corporeal greed set the tone. When it comes to getting their way, while they criticize other world leaders who commit similar crimes. They have to account for their actions, or their war crimes, no matter how they may try to justify them.
Ted Rudow III, MA
Religion of greed
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77 [at] aol.com )
Wednesday Jan 2nd, 2008 11:57 AM
The more "democratic" another nation is, after all, the closer the rich and the powerful can work together, the greater the pickings and the booty available, and the less controls there are on their actions.
The rich can grow richer and the poor can grow poorer because, after all, the rich think, it's the survival of the fittest. There is no proof for evolution. It has to be believed. Therefore its a faith, therefore its a religion!
Thus corporeal greed set the tone. When it comes to getting their way, while they criticize other world leaders who commit similar crimes. They have to account for their actions, or their war crimes, no matter how they may try to justify them.
Ted Rudow III, MA
Thursday, December 27, 2007
Gore's cult?
Sacbee: Opinion Newsletter Blogs | Cartoons | Daily Debate | Editorials | Forum | Letters
Cal Thomas: Gore's cult of global alarmism
Wednesday, December 26, 2007
Fear As I've often said in the past, one of the Enemy's principal weapons has always been fear. If he can terrify men and women and put them in fear of their lives, then as he said in the book of Job, "Skin for skin, yea, all that a man hath will he give for his life" (Job 2:4). When the men and women of the world fear catastrophe, they generally look to their governments to save them rather than the Lord, sad to say. So what happens? Governments gain more control and power, the rich and the powerful grow even more rich and powerful, and the Enemy's plan of strengthening the very institutions he'll someday use for ultimate power and control under his One World government is.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Cal Thomas: Gore's cult of global alarmism
Wednesday, December 26, 2007
Fear As I've often said in the past, one of the Enemy's principal weapons has always been fear. If he can terrify men and women and put them in fear of their lives, then as he said in the book of Job, "Skin for skin, yea, all that a man hath will he give for his life" (Job 2:4). When the men and women of the world fear catastrophe, they generally look to their governments to save them rather than the Lord, sad to say. So what happens? Governments gain more control and power, the rich and the powerful grow even more rich and powerful, and the Enemy's plan of strengthening the very institutions he'll someday use for ultimate power and control under his One World government is.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Saturday, December 22, 2007
True peace
The Caledonian-Record News
ST. JOHNSBURY,Vermont
SEARCH
Friday, December 21, 2007
Letters to the Editor
12/21/2007 Email this article • Print this article
True Peace
To the Editor:
Although peace has been the goal of mankind for thousands of years - and the desire for peace is never so great as it is at Christmas - it seems that our ability to find or establish peace continues to elude us.
Today, after the end of the Cold War, bloody hostilities continue on nearly every continent, reaching global proportions once again after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 in New York City, Washington, D.C., and near Pittsburgh. As Pete Seeger's well-known folk song from the '60s asked, "Where have all the flowers gone? ... When will they ever learn? When will they ever learn?"
True peace on every level - from international conflicts to our personal lives - has become more difficult than ever to achieve.
"And in Bethlehem today, children fear, yet still they play
While mothers cry and fathers pray for peace to come again.
And a round the weary world echoes the refrain:
'Christmas in Bethlehem, when shall true love reign?'
One day soon the Prince of Love, will return from skies above, and His pow'r shall overcome all pain and tears and war. Then shall songs of joy and praise ring out from shore to shore.
Christmas in Bethlehem, peace on Earth once more.
Christmas in Bethlehem, peace on Earth once more."
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park, Calif.
ST. JOHNSBURY,Vermont
SEARCH
Friday, December 21, 2007
Letters to the Editor
12/21/2007 Email this article • Print this article
True Peace
To the Editor:
Although peace has been the goal of mankind for thousands of years - and the desire for peace is never so great as it is at Christmas - it seems that our ability to find or establish peace continues to elude us.
Today, after the end of the Cold War, bloody hostilities continue on nearly every continent, reaching global proportions once again after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 in New York City, Washington, D.C., and near Pittsburgh. As Pete Seeger's well-known folk song from the '60s asked, "Where have all the flowers gone? ... When will they ever learn? When will they ever learn?"
True peace on every level - from international conflicts to our personal lives - has become more difficult than ever to achieve.
"And in Bethlehem today, children fear, yet still they play
While mothers cry and fathers pray for peace to come again.
And a round the weary world echoes the refrain:
'Christmas in Bethlehem, when shall true love reign?'
One day soon the Prince of Love, will return from skies above, and His pow'r shall overcome all pain and tears and war. Then shall songs of joy and praise ring out from shore to shore.
Christmas in Bethlehem, peace on Earth once more.
Christmas in Bethlehem, peace on Earth once more."
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park, Calif.
Monday, December 17, 2007
Iraqi exiles in Syria
Iraqi exiles in Syria
Sacbee: Opinion Newsletter Blogs | Cartoons | Daily Debate | Editorials | Forum | Letters
Grim past, dim future for Iraqi exiles in Syria
Saturday, December 15, 2007
Death of countless
Iraqi physicians, overseen by epidemiologists at Johns Hopkins University's Bloomberg School of Public Health, published a study last year in the British medical journal The Lancet. The study estimated that 655,000 more people than normal have died in Iraq since coalition forces invaded the country in March 2003. This is more than 20 times the estimate of 30,000 civilian deaths that President Bush gave in a speech last December.
In a statement released on Thursday, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) criticized the Israeli closure and occupation of Palestinian land, which has left hospitals unable to treat the sick and injured, and has left farmers unable to work their land.
The Red Cross called on Israel to `lift the retaliatory measures which are paralyzing life in Gaza`, and to stop targeting the civilian population.
But it's those who sent them to war in the first place for whom the greatest chastisements and judgments of God are reserved those who caused the death of countless innocents, the making of scores of widows and orphans, the breaking of hearts and bodies, those whose hands are red with the blood of those they've caused to die through sanctions, disease, malnutrition, bombs, and other weapons of war.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Sacbee: Opinion Newsletter Blogs | Cartoons | Daily Debate | Editorials | Forum | Letters
Grim past, dim future for Iraqi exiles in Syria
Saturday, December 15, 2007
Death of countless
Iraqi physicians, overseen by epidemiologists at Johns Hopkins University's Bloomberg School of Public Health, published a study last year in the British medical journal The Lancet. The study estimated that 655,000 more people than normal have died in Iraq since coalition forces invaded the country in March 2003. This is more than 20 times the estimate of 30,000 civilian deaths that President Bush gave in a speech last December.
In a statement released on Thursday, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) criticized the Israeli closure and occupation of Palestinian land, which has left hospitals unable to treat the sick and injured, and has left farmers unable to work their land.
The Red Cross called on Israel to `lift the retaliatory measures which are paralyzing life in Gaza`, and to stop targeting the civilian population.
But it's those who sent them to war in the first place for whom the greatest chastisements and judgments of God are reserved those who caused the death of countless innocents, the making of scores of widows and orphans, the breaking of hearts and bodies, those whose hands are red with the blood of those they've caused to die through sanctions, disease, malnutrition, bombs, and other weapons of war.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Saturday, December 15, 2007
All wars are evil
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2007/12/15/18467192.php
All wars are evil
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77 [at] aol.com )
Saturday Dec 15th, 2007 1:08 PM
All wars are evil! Some wars are necessary, but all wars are evil.
Invasions of other lands and “nation building” elsewhere, even to preserve access to oil, or to intrude in civil wars in Asia or anywhere else, do not qualify as “justifiable wars.” Not for the human beings who suffer and die there." Keith Kreitman
Iraqi physicians, overseen by epidemiologists at Johns Hopkins University's Bloomberg School of Public Health, published a study last year in the British medical journal The Lancet. The study estimated that 655,000 more people than normal have died in Iraq since coalition forces invaded the country in March 2003. This is more than 20 times the estimate of 30,000 civilian deaths that President Bush gave in a speech last December.
In a statement released on Thursday, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) criticized the Israeli closure and occupation of Palestinian land, which has left hospitals unable to treat the sick and injured, and has left farmers unable to work their land.The Red Cross called on Israel to `lift the retaliatory measures which are paralyzing life in Gaza`, and to stop targeting the civilian population
But it's those who sent them to war in the first place for whom the greatest chastisements and judgments of God are reserved—those who caused the death of countless innocents, the making of scores of widows and orphans, the breaking of hearts and bodies, those whose hands are red with the blood of those they've caused to die through sanctions, disease, malnutrition, bombs, and other weapons of war.
Ted Rudow III,MA
All wars are evil
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77 [at] aol.com )
Saturday Dec 15th, 2007 1:08 PM
All wars are evil! Some wars are necessary, but all wars are evil.
Invasions of other lands and “nation building” elsewhere, even to preserve access to oil, or to intrude in civil wars in Asia or anywhere else, do not qualify as “justifiable wars.” Not for the human beings who suffer and die there." Keith Kreitman
Iraqi physicians, overseen by epidemiologists at Johns Hopkins University's Bloomberg School of Public Health, published a study last year in the British medical journal The Lancet. The study estimated that 655,000 more people than normal have died in Iraq since coalition forces invaded the country in March 2003. This is more than 20 times the estimate of 30,000 civilian deaths that President Bush gave in a speech last December.
In a statement released on Thursday, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) criticized the Israeli closure and occupation of Palestinian land, which has left hospitals unable to treat the sick and injured, and has left farmers unable to work their land.The Red Cross called on Israel to `lift the retaliatory measures which are paralyzing life in Gaza`, and to stop targeting the civilian population
But it's those who sent them to war in the first place for whom the greatest chastisements and judgments of God are reserved—those who caused the death of countless innocents, the making of scores of widows and orphans, the breaking of hearts and bodies, those whose hands are red with the blood of those they've caused to die through sanctions, disease, malnutrition, bombs, and other weapons of war.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Thursday, December 13, 2007
True peace
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2007/12/13/18466792.php
True peace
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77 [at] aol.com )
Thursday Dec 13th, 2007 4:59 PM
Although peace has been the goal of mankind for thousands of years — and the desire for peace is never so great as it is at Christmas — it seems that our ability to find or establish peace continues to elude us.
Today, after the end of the Cold War, bloody hostilities continue on nearly every continent, reaching global proportions once again after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 in New York City, Washington, D.C., and near Pittsburgh. As Pete Seeger’s well-known folk song from the ’60s asked, “Where have all the flowers gone? When will they ever learn? When will they ever learn?”
True peace on every level — from international conflicts to our personal lives — has become more difficult than ever to achieve.
"And in Bethlehem today,children fear, yet still they play
While mothers cry and fathers pray for peace to come again.
And a round the weary world echoes the refrain:
“Christmas in Bethlehem, when shall true love reign?”
One day soon the Prince of Love,will return from skies above,and His pow’r shall overcome all pain and tears and war.Then shall songs of joy and praise ring out from shore to shore.
Christmas in Bethlehem, peace on Earth once more.
Christmas in Bethlehem,Peace on Earth once more."
Michael Dooley
Ted Rudow III,MA
True peace
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77 [at] aol.com )
Thursday Dec 13th, 2007 4:59 PM
Although peace has been the goal of mankind for thousands of years — and the desire for peace is never so great as it is at Christmas — it seems that our ability to find or establish peace continues to elude us.
Today, after the end of the Cold War, bloody hostilities continue on nearly every continent, reaching global proportions once again after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 in New York City, Washington, D.C., and near Pittsburgh. As Pete Seeger’s well-known folk song from the ’60s asked, “Where have all the flowers gone? When will they ever learn? When will they ever learn?”
True peace on every level — from international conflicts to our personal lives — has become more difficult than ever to achieve.
"And in Bethlehem today,children fear, yet still they play
While mothers cry and fathers pray for peace to come again.
And a round the weary world echoes the refrain:
“Christmas in Bethlehem, when shall true love reign?”
One day soon the Prince of Love,will return from skies above,and His pow’r shall overcome all pain and tears and war.Then shall songs of joy and praise ring out from shore to shore.
Christmas in Bethlehem, peace on Earth once more.
Christmas in Bethlehem,Peace on Earth once more."
Michael Dooley
Ted Rudow III,MA
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
King George
Tuesday
December
11
2007
San Mateo Daily Journal
Home
Local News
State / National / World
Sports
Opinion / Letters
Business
Arts / Entertainment
Letters to the editor
Hypocritical friendship
Editor,
King George departed even before the tumult had died. His helicopter carried him away over the horizon, just as his trusty steed carries the cowboy into the sunset at the end of the movie. At that moment, the speeches in the assembly hall were still going ahead at full blast. Even if Bush wanted to, could he do anything? Is he capable of putting pressure on Israel, in the face of vigorous opposition from the pro-Israel lobby, and especially from the Christian-Evangelist public, to which he himself belongs? Bush is a hypocrite pretending to be everybody’s friend and nobody’s enemy, when in their hearts they know exactly where they stand, and which way they’ll go when the showdown comes, as many Republican leaders have. May God damn it for its subtle treacherous “neutrality” with the world--pretending to be a friend of both God and the world at the same time.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park
The power of Arab oil
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77Q [at] aol.com )
Monday Dec 10th, 2007
Gadhafi's son Seif al-Islam said the visit, the veteran leader's first to France since 1973, would celebrate "the new relations" between the two countries. The invitation from Paris came after the release of Bulgarian medics imprisoned in Libya on charges of infecting children with HIV/AIDS.
Sarkozy visited Tripoli immediately afterward, overseeing the signing of arms sales and an accord to build a nuclear plant for water desalination, and underscoring Libya's return to respectability after years of isolation.
"Libya is not a small insignificant country. A major player on the oil market, at the crossroads between the Arab and African world, threatened by the advance of Islamism, Tripoli plays a vital role for stability in a part of the world where we have vital interests," the newspaper said. "There is no shame in recognizing that and defending our interests with realism," it added.
The power of Arab oil in contrast to the oil-starved nations of the capitalistic West! The U.S. alone, though it has only eight percent of the world's population, uses 40% of the world's oil, and her rate of use is increasing by nearly ten percent a year, much of which she imports from the Arabs. Europe, too, imports over two-thirds of her oil from the Arabs and uses a large portion of the world's total, and the under-developed Arab states are absolutely oil rich! In fact, Arab oil is making the Arabs one of the richest and most powerful forces on Earth with her hands throttling the throat of an oil-thirsty world!
Ted Rudow III,MA
December
11
2007
San Mateo Daily Journal
Home
Local News
State / National / World
Sports
Opinion / Letters
Business
Arts / Entertainment
Letters to the editor
Hypocritical friendship
Editor,
King George departed even before the tumult had died. His helicopter carried him away over the horizon, just as his trusty steed carries the cowboy into the sunset at the end of the movie. At that moment, the speeches in the assembly hall were still going ahead at full blast. Even if Bush wanted to, could he do anything? Is he capable of putting pressure on Israel, in the face of vigorous opposition from the pro-Israel lobby, and especially from the Christian-Evangelist public, to which he himself belongs? Bush is a hypocrite pretending to be everybody’s friend and nobody’s enemy, when in their hearts they know exactly where they stand, and which way they’ll go when the showdown comes, as many Republican leaders have. May God damn it for its subtle treacherous “neutrality” with the world--pretending to be a friend of both God and the world at the same time.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park
The power of Arab oil
by Ted Rudow III,MA ( Tedr77Q [at] aol.com )
Monday Dec 10th, 2007
Gadhafi's son Seif al-Islam said the visit, the veteran leader's first to France since 1973, would celebrate "the new relations" between the two countries. The invitation from Paris came after the release of Bulgarian medics imprisoned in Libya on charges of infecting children with HIV/AIDS.
Sarkozy visited Tripoli immediately afterward, overseeing the signing of arms sales and an accord to build a nuclear plant for water desalination, and underscoring Libya's return to respectability after years of isolation.
"Libya is not a small insignificant country. A major player on the oil market, at the crossroads between the Arab and African world, threatened by the advance of Islamism, Tripoli plays a vital role for stability in a part of the world where we have vital interests," the newspaper said. "There is no shame in recognizing that and defending our interests with realism," it added.
The power of Arab oil in contrast to the oil-starved nations of the capitalistic West! The U.S. alone, though it has only eight percent of the world's population, uses 40% of the world's oil, and her rate of use is increasing by nearly ten percent a year, much of which she imports from the Arabs. Europe, too, imports over two-thirds of her oil from the Arabs and uses a large portion of the world's total, and the under-developed Arab states are absolutely oil rich! In fact, Arab oil is making the Arabs one of the richest and most powerful forces on Earth with her hands throttling the throat of an oil-thirsty world!
Ted Rudow III,MA
Monday, December 10, 2007
The Commentator
The Commentator www.thecommentatorjm.com January 2008 Edition
Foreign Affairs [7]
Go Directly to Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [Next Page] [Previous Page] [Disclaimer] [Contact]
Iran's 25,000-strong Jewish community
Ted Rudow III,MA (Tedr77@aol.com)
"The central committee of Iran's 25,000-strong Jewish community, which has in the past expressed unease over Ahmadinejad's stance on the Holocaust, added its voice to the condemnation of his hostile reception in New York, Iranian Jews strongly condemn such impoliteness and willfulness, as such behavior has targeted Iran's president who legally represents Iranians," it said in a statement.
On the another hand, AIPAC, or the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, describes itself as the most important organization affecting the U.S. relationship with Israel. With a budget of $65 million, and membership now standing at over 100,000, it is no wonder that congressional staffers consider it one of the most powerful and effective lobbies on Capitol Hill. Including AIPAC's support for U.S. military aid to Israel, which amounts to over $3 billion per year.
"It is widely acknowledged that the reps and senators are ticked at AIPAC, and their hostility seems to be growing these days. With upwards of 60% of their campaign contributions coming directly or indirectly from the Israel Lobby, the Democratic congressmen are not free to respond to their antiwar base." John Walsh. Some Muslims see a new Crusade in the making, waged jointly by the Jewish Israelis and the Christian Americans.
[Back to Main Page]
Foreign Affairs [7]
Go Directly to Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [Next Page] [Previous Page] [Disclaimer] [Contact]
Iran's 25,000-strong Jewish community
Ted Rudow III,MA (Tedr77@aol.com)
"The central committee of Iran's 25,000-strong Jewish community, which has in the past expressed unease over Ahmadinejad's stance on the Holocaust, added its voice to the condemnation of his hostile reception in New York, Iranian Jews strongly condemn such impoliteness and willfulness, as such behavior has targeted Iran's president who legally represents Iranians," it said in a statement.
On the another hand, AIPAC, or the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, describes itself as the most important organization affecting the U.S. relationship with Israel. With a budget of $65 million, and membership now standing at over 100,000, it is no wonder that congressional staffers consider it one of the most powerful and effective lobbies on Capitol Hill. Including AIPAC's support for U.S. military aid to Israel, which amounts to over $3 billion per year.
"It is widely acknowledged that the reps and senators are ticked at AIPAC, and their hostility seems to be growing these days. With upwards of 60% of their campaign contributions coming directly or indirectly from the Israel Lobby, the Democratic congressmen are not free to respond to their antiwar base." John Walsh. Some Muslims see a new Crusade in the making, waged jointly by the Jewish Israelis and the Christian Americans.
[Back to Main Page]
Saturday, December 08, 2007
Bush's
WEEKEND
December
08
2007
San Mateo Daily Journal
Home
Local News
State / National / World
Sports
Opinion / Letters
Business
Arts / Entertainment
Lifestyle
Obituaries
Calendar
Special
Submit Event
Comics / Games
Classifieds
DJ Designers
Community Forum
Archives
Advertise With Us
About Us
Letters to the editor
Bush’s totalitarian undercurrents is obvious
Editor,
“Pinochet, when he was overthrowing the Democratic government of Chile, told Chilean citizens that there was going to be a terrible terrorist attack, with armed insurgents. Now there were real insurgents, there was a real threat, but then he produces what he called Plan Z, which were fake papers claiming that these terrorists were going to assassinate all these military leaders at once,” Naomi Wolf said.
Most Americans reject outright any comparisons of post-9/11 America with the fascism and totalitarianism of Nazi Germany or Pinochet’s Chile. Instead they turn to Bush, as a compromise candidate, a little more palatable neo-fascist. In other words, they knew they had in Bush the man that he is, he would go to military rule. He’s a great pretender, a real ham actor, and he’s making the public think he’s a great humanitarian and a great democratic leader protecting the people. Which is the opposite of what he is.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park
December
08
2007
San Mateo Daily Journal
Home
Local News
State / National / World
Sports
Opinion / Letters
Business
Arts / Entertainment
Lifestyle
Obituaries
Calendar
Special
Submit Event
Comics / Games
Classifieds
DJ Designers
Community Forum
Archives
Advertise With Us
About Us
Letters to the editor
Bush’s totalitarian undercurrents is obvious
Editor,
“Pinochet, when he was overthrowing the Democratic government of Chile, told Chilean citizens that there was going to be a terrible terrorist attack, with armed insurgents. Now there were real insurgents, there was a real threat, but then he produces what he called Plan Z, which were fake papers claiming that these terrorists were going to assassinate all these military leaders at once,” Naomi Wolf said.
Most Americans reject outright any comparisons of post-9/11 America with the fascism and totalitarianism of Nazi Germany or Pinochet’s Chile. Instead they turn to Bush, as a compromise candidate, a little more palatable neo-fascist. In other words, they knew they had in Bush the man that he is, he would go to military rule. He’s a great pretender, a real ham actor, and he’s making the public think he’s a great humanitarian and a great democratic leader protecting the people. Which is the opposite of what he is.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park
Friday, December 07, 2007
Ike
Sacbee: Opinion Newsletter Blogs | Cartoons | Daily Debate | Editorials | Forum | Letters
John R. Bolton: The flaws in the NIE's 'key judgments' on Iran
Friday, December 7, 2007
Ike
The conclusions of the new assessment are likely to be a major factor in the tense international negotiations aimed at getting Iran to halt its nuclear energy program. Concerns about Iran were raised sharply after President Bush had suggested in October that a nuclear-armed Iran could lead to World War III,and Vice President Dick Cheney promised serious consequences if the government in Tehran did not abandon its nuclear program. Finally, it should be noted that those who benefit from war or the threat of war are many more than just the old military-industrial complex that former President Eisenhower warned about. Indeed, remember that most of the uniformed military opposed the attack on Iraq. It was pro-war neocon civilians who took over Pentagon policymaking positions. It's the same drumbeat to war that Ike warned about!
Ted Rudow III,MA
John R. Bolton: The flaws in the NIE's 'key judgments' on Iran
Friday, December 7, 2007
Ike
The conclusions of the new assessment are likely to be a major factor in the tense international negotiations aimed at getting Iran to halt its nuclear energy program. Concerns about Iran were raised sharply after President Bush had suggested in October that a nuclear-armed Iran could lead to World War III,and Vice President Dick Cheney promised serious consequences if the government in Tehran did not abandon its nuclear program. Finally, it should be noted that those who benefit from war or the threat of war are many more than just the old military-industrial complex that former President Eisenhower warned about. Indeed, remember that most of the uniformed military opposed the attack on Iraq. It was pro-war neocon civilians who took over Pentagon policymaking positions. It's the same drumbeat to war that Ike warned about!
Ted Rudow III,MA
Fear, sex are driving forces within Children of God cult?
SFGate Home Business Sports Entertainment Travel
Classifieds Jobs Real Estate Cars
SFGate Web Search by YAHOO!
Comments
Review: Fear, sex are driving forces within Children of God cult
Mary D'Ambrosio
Jesus Freaks A True Story of Murder and Madness on the Evangelical Edge By Don Lattin HARPERONE; 236 PAGES; $24.95 You couldn't beat it for tabloid fodder: Anointed prophet of a secretive evangelical mission-cum-sex...
Add Your Comment Read Full Story
Tedr wrote:This program seems to have found its impetus in Don Lattins recently published book, Jesus Freaks. Although Lattins book does contain some sound research and factual information, it is laced with inaccuracies, misconceptions and erroneous conclusions lacking a factual basenot to mention, sketchy research. I want to state that after reading the reviews,"Jesus Freaks" about Ricky Rodriguez suicide and the killing a innocent woman, I was taken back by outright lies and Lattin misconstrued representation of The Family, as well as by the false testimonies by ex-members, and other "officials". In my opinion, this ranks with the worst in "yellow journalism". My grandfather, Phil Hindley, was the city editor for the San Francisco Examiner, would roll in his grave. I also find it nearly unbelievable that Don Lattin will stoop to such low levels to blame Karen Zerby for what happened. I can personally affirm that The Family is sincerely dedicated to helping others.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Classifieds Jobs Real Estate Cars
SFGate Web Search by YAHOO!
Comments
Review: Fear, sex are driving forces within Children of God cult
Mary D'Ambrosio
Jesus Freaks A True Story of Murder and Madness on the Evangelical Edge By Don Lattin HARPERONE; 236 PAGES; $24.95 You couldn't beat it for tabloid fodder: Anointed prophet of a secretive evangelical mission-cum-sex...
Add Your Comment Read Full Story
Tedr wrote:This program seems to have found its impetus in Don Lattins recently published book, Jesus Freaks. Although Lattins book does contain some sound research and factual information, it is laced with inaccuracies, misconceptions and erroneous conclusions lacking a factual basenot to mention, sketchy research. I want to state that after reading the reviews,"Jesus Freaks" about Ricky Rodriguez suicide and the killing a innocent woman, I was taken back by outright lies and Lattin misconstrued representation of The Family, as well as by the false testimonies by ex-members, and other "officials". In my opinion, this ranks with the worst in "yellow journalism". My grandfather, Phil Hindley, was the city editor for the San Francisco Examiner, would roll in his grave. I also find it nearly unbelievable that Don Lattin will stoop to such low levels to blame Karen Zerby for what happened. I can personally affirm that The Family is sincerely dedicated to helping others.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Ike
San Francisco the Examiner
California |Change My City
Fri. 56/45
News
Politics
Entertainment
Sports
Business
Blogs
Opinion
Ken Garcia
N. Korea
Iraq
Iran
San Francisco Home > Opinion > Letters
4 hrs ago » Letters: December 7, 2007
Dec 7, 2007 The Examiner
The Examiner gives preference to letters containing fewer than 150 words. Please include name, phone number and city of residence.
Ike warned of militarists
A new assessment by American intelligence agencies concludes that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003 and that the program remains on hold, contradicting an assessment two years ago that Tehran was working inexorably toward building a bomb.
The conclusions of the new assessment are likely to be a major factor in the tense international negotiations aimed at getting Iran to halt its nuclear energy program. Concerns about Iran were raised sharply after President Bush had suggested in October that a nuclear-armed Iran could lead to “World War III,” and Vice President Dick Cheney promised “serious consequences” if the government in Tehran did not abandon its nuclear program.
Finally, it should be noted that those who benefit from war or the threat of war are many more than just the old military-industrial complex that former President Eisenhower warned about.
Indeed, remember that most of the uniformed military opposed the attack on Iraq. It was pro-war neocon civilians who took over Pentagon policymaking positions. It’s the same drumbeat to war that Ike warned about!
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park
California |Change My City
Fri. 56/45
News
Politics
Entertainment
Sports
Business
Blogs
Opinion
Ken Garcia
N. Korea
Iraq
Iran
San Francisco Home > Opinion > Letters
4 hrs ago » Letters: December 7, 2007
Dec 7, 2007 The Examiner
The Examiner gives preference to letters containing fewer than 150 words. Please include name, phone number and city of residence.
Ike warned of militarists
A new assessment by American intelligence agencies concludes that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003 and that the program remains on hold, contradicting an assessment two years ago that Tehran was working inexorably toward building a bomb.
The conclusions of the new assessment are likely to be a major factor in the tense international negotiations aimed at getting Iran to halt its nuclear energy program. Concerns about Iran were raised sharply after President Bush had suggested in October that a nuclear-armed Iran could lead to “World War III,” and Vice President Dick Cheney promised “serious consequences” if the government in Tehran did not abandon its nuclear program.
Finally, it should be noted that those who benefit from war or the threat of war are many more than just the old military-industrial complex that former President Eisenhower warned about.
Indeed, remember that most of the uniformed military opposed the attack on Iraq. It was pro-war neocon civilians who took over Pentagon policymaking positions. It’s the same drumbeat to war that Ike warned about!
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park
Saturday, December 01, 2007
He’s the great pretender
San Francisco Examiner
California |Change My City
Sat. 54/47
Sun.
59/51
Mon.
65/53
Print Edition | Marketplace
Home
News
Politics
Opinion
Examiner Newsroom
Ken Garcia
Glenn Dickey
Iraq
Iran
Commentary
Editorial
|
Letters
San Francisco Home > Opinion > Letters
Article Examiner
This is the most recent article version.
He’s the great pretender
“[Augusto] Pinochet, when he was overthrowing the democratic government of Chile, told Chilean citizens that there was going to be a terrible terrorist attack, with armed insurgents. Now there were real insurgents, there was a real threat, but then he produces what he called Plan Z, which were fake papers claiming that these terrorists were going to assassinate all these military leaders at once.” — Naomi Wolf
Most Americans reject outright any comparisons of post-9/11 America with the fascism and totalitarianism of Nazi Germany or Pinochet’s Chile. Instead they turn to George Bush, as a compromise candidate, a more palatable neofascist. In other words, they knew they had in Bush the man that he is, and he would go to military rule. He’s a great pretender, a real ham actor, and he’s making the public think that he’s a great humanitarian and a great democratic leader protecting the people, which is the opposite of what he is.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park
California |Change My City
Sat. 54/47
Sun.
59/51
Mon.
65/53
Print Edition | Marketplace
Home
News
Politics
Opinion
Examiner Newsroom
Ken Garcia
Glenn Dickey
Iraq
Iran
Commentary
Editorial
|
Letters
San Francisco Home > Opinion > Letters
Article Examiner
This is the most recent article version.
He’s the great pretender
“[Augusto] Pinochet, when he was overthrowing the democratic government of Chile, told Chilean citizens that there was going to be a terrible terrorist attack, with armed insurgents. Now there were real insurgents, there was a real threat, but then he produces what he called Plan Z, which were fake papers claiming that these terrorists were going to assassinate all these military leaders at once.” — Naomi Wolf
Most Americans reject outright any comparisons of post-9/11 America with the fascism and totalitarianism of Nazi Germany or Pinochet’s Chile. Instead they turn to George Bush, as a compromise candidate, a more palatable neofascist. In other words, they knew they had in Bush the man that he is, and he would go to military rule. He’s a great pretender, a real ham actor, and he’s making the public think that he’s a great humanitarian and a great democratic leader protecting the people, which is the opposite of what he is.
Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)